|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 12 posts ] |
|
Eldar Aspects? |
dafrca
|
Post subject: Eldar Aspects? Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 10:52 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:02 pm Posts: 10956 Location: Burbank, CA, USA
|
OK, in the new test list I can mix and match the aspects.
What combos do you all suggest and why?
dafrca
_________________ "Every Man is a But Spark in the Darkness" - Cities of Death, page 59
Come fight me, if you dare...... http://dd-janks.mybrute.com
|
|
Top |
|
 |
dafrca
|
Post subject: Eldar Aspects? Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 6:09 am |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:02 pm Posts: 10956 Location: Burbank, CA, USA
|
OK, here is what I came up with;
Troupe #1: 4 Fire Dragons and 2 Dark Reapers I am using the Dark Reapers as Fire Dragons until the list is fixed.
Troupe #2: 6 Striking Scorpions
Troupe #3: 6 Warp Spiders
What do you guys think?
dafrca
_________________ "Every Man is a But Spark in the Darkness" - Cities of Death, page 59
Come fight me, if you dare...... http://dd-janks.mybrute.com
|
|
Top |
|
 |
CyberShadow
|
Post subject: Eldar Aspects? Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 12:12 pm |
|
Swarm Tyrant |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 6:22 pm Posts: 9348 Location: Singapore
|
I think that in general, formations dedicated to a specific role work best. If you mix Dragons and Reapers, you will be unliekly to use the best of either. Mixing Scorpions and Banshees might work, but I will probably keep formations with one unit. The only big exception to this are the Dire Avengers, I think that these guys will be great if one or two are added to other Aspects, such as Dragons.
_________________ https://www.cybershadow.ninja - A brief look into my twisted world, including wargames and beyond. https://www.net-armageddon.org - The official NetEA (Epic Armageddon) site and resource.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Legion 4
|
Post subject: Eldar Aspects? Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 3:46 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm Posts: 36984 Location: Ohio - USA
|
We're going to keep our Aspects as they are, and modify E-A as we see fit and merge anything we like from E-A to our "hybrid" rules. We're not going to bend to fit G/W, in this case ... 
_________________ Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
|
|
Top |
|
 |
dafrca
|
Post subject: Eldar Aspects? Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 6:05 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:02 pm Posts: 10956 Location: Burbank, CA, USA
|
|
Top |
|
 |
CyberShadow
|
Post subject: Eldar Aspects? Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 6:14 pm |
|
Swarm Tyrant |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 6:22 pm Posts: 9348 Location: Singapore
|
Quote (dafrca @ 10 2003 April,18:05) | [quote="Legion 4,10 2003 April,07:46"]Once I deside I will trade/sell off the extra stands I have ? | In that case... Aspect warriors are really over-rated. You should not use many at all... In fact, it would probably be better if I took tham all off your hands... 
_________________ https://www.cybershadow.ninja - A brief look into my twisted world, including wargames and beyond. https://www.net-armageddon.org - The official NetEA (Epic Armageddon) site and resource.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
dafrca
|
Post subject: Eldar Aspects? Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 7:09 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:02 pm Posts: 10956 Location: Burbank, CA, USA
|
|
Top |
|
 |
signius
|
Post subject: Eldar Aspects? Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2003 10:05 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 9:23 pm Posts: 873 Location: San Jose, California
|
I am in agreement with the Bossman. I think aspects should be kept clean. I like throwing formations of one type of aspects at the enemy. Though, if you are palying a low point game then, this kind of thing may work. I like hawks and banshees. Reapers a cool but, like spiders, most do not have very many.
Oh, and by the way. I am intrested in your extras as well. 
_________________ Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant!
|
|
Top |
|
 |
dafrca
|
Post subject: Eldar Aspects? Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 12:17 am |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:02 pm Posts: 10956 Location: Burbank, CA, USA
|
I was thinking of going with full troupes of the same type. However, I kept thinking maybe I was missing something. So now I will go ahead and make up a few that are all 6 the same then catalog what is left over.
dafrca
_________________ "Every Man is a But Spark in the Darkness" - Cities of Death, page 59
Come fight me, if you dare...... http://dd-janks.mybrute.com
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Legion 4
|
Post subject: Eldar Aspects? Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 5:41 am |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm Posts: 36984 Location: Ohio - USA
|
I see, I stand corrected. You wanted to merge your Aspects by types that are compatible based on E-A. Well I'm with the others, keep them clean, ie., don't fight them as a mixed detachment. ?Use them to support your Guardians by taking advantage of their "special" abilties. ?Sometimes this may be difficult, but if used correctly, could help out with your mission ...
_________________ Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
|
|
Top |
|
 |
dafrca
|
Post subject: Eldar Aspects? Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 6:19 am |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:02 pm Posts: 10956 Location: Burbank, CA, USA
|
Great, the vote is clearly for the formation to stay "pure" for the most part. So now I will have to make up a few formations for myself and then organize the rest for trade/sale.
Thanks for the advise and opinions people. It is nice to bounce these things off you'all.
dafrca
_________________ "Every Man is a But Spark in the Darkness" - Cities of Death, page 59
Come fight me, if you dare...... http://dd-janks.mybrute.com
|
|
Top |
|
 |
nealhunt
|
Post subject: Eldar Aspects? Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2003 6:39 pm |
|
Purestrain |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm Posts: 9617 Location: Nashville, TN, USA
|
I've thought of a couple combos. ============
Warp spiders/Swooping hawks (probably 2/4). Movement is close enough to stay together.
Put the WS out front in an assault. Their FF is only one worse and their CC is the same. If the WS is in base to base, you lose nothing. If not, you lose little. Either way, you gain twice the chance of saving the first couple hits (3+ v 5+).
You also have the option of doing a double-move and shoot with the WS. You're not going to do any damage, but you can drop a BM. With the hit and run tactic this might be useful.
====================
Fire Dragons/Dire Avengers.
This is going to be about the same as WS/SH. The assault difference is not as good, but the MW range attack of the FD makes damaging someone with a double move and shoot an actual possibility. With the slow speed, I think a double and shoot may be a more likely option.
====================
Depending on the opponent, a Scorpion/Banshee combo could offer advantages. If you are fighting someone with more CC ability (like orks), the HB are going to be more effective in assault because of the first strike. However, you might want a couple Scorpions out front for the better armor save.
================
They aren't superlative reasons, but they might provide a bit of advantage. In pretty much every case, a combo of two detachments would work better. Not just because of numbers, but because you would definitely have enough troops to let each one do its assigned role without being watered down.
_________________ Neal
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 12 posts ] |
|