elsmore wrote:
primarch wrote:
Actually, given GW way of thinking things, doing 10mm is precisely what they'd think is necessary to invalidate such competition. Releasing another 6mm scale epic would just fuel the growth of similar 6mm companies as proxies.
10mm however would mean they are the only show in town. Typical GW thinking.
Primarch
It's not that I think 6mm is more likely than 10mm. I think the small scale crowd don't register on GW's radar, except when they feel their IP had been abused. Look at the 40k army bundles. One click, £1,000 sales - that's where GW want to be. Or selling the rights to make computer games, or films.
Hi!
Having been a retailer and dealt with GW, I gotta say that when it comes to epic, since epic 40k's commercial failure, its been their attitude that since you (we) didn't like what they wanted epic to be its been "you get nothing".
Epic is the only GW game to go from a "core" game to out of print and dead in a 2 year life span (1997 to 1999). It was the first time GW experienced having to move "dead stock" via clearance at RIDICULOUSLY low prices.
They went from 10-15% of sales coming from epic to zero. Specialist games (all games including epic) at thier peak made 5% (with epic accounting for half). GW royally screwed up what they had going with epic. It may not compare to sales of WFB or 40k, but 10-15% is better than zero.
The top dogs at GW have not forgotten that failure and all epic endeavors, at best, have been half-hearted. Heck Specialist games re-introduced epic and GW's support lasted a whopping 10 months from its start to the infamous "reorganization", a clear euphemism for the pulling of resources and any real support for the game.
The bottom line is that 6mm GW "had" a market until they themselves killed it. They were neither good stweards or savvy business people when it came to epic.
So the small scale crowd DID register, once upon a time, but to this day GW blames the consumer for its failure instead of themselves.
Typical GW.
Primarch