Evil and Chaos wrote:
Not a bad suggestion.
But I think some blunt and responsible culling of idle army champions and even one or two ERC members would also help greatly. The community can't be led anywhere if half the "leaders" aren't "leading".
I agree that a 'review' of the current state of lists and development is probably in order, along with renewed commitment from ACs, etc.
BlackLegion wrote:
I don't thank that forcing people to work on army lists they don't have an interest in will work.
Two year ago we hat Imperial Guard Month, Space Marine Month, etc. But this didn't stop developement of other armies.
I am not thinking of forcing anyone to work on a list if they don't want, but instead something like going to the Tyranid AC and saying 'I want a monstrous creature army list, that fits the background that I have written here and will be put against these lists, and here is a deadline.... please. This is a priority above other development in a small time window.'
We could also then set up groups for painting and modelling, terrain, scenarios/campaign within the background, battle report groups, suppliment layout and graphics, etc all with similar background and attempt to get as many people as possible involved in any way they wanted. I would be happy to steer this and tie it together with structure and background text, etc and co-ordinate development.
It would just be one project that everyone could get behind if they wanted, in some capacity which they considered their strength and would be another showcase for the game and development.
_________________
https://www.cybershadow.ninja - A brief look into my twisted world, including wargames and beyond.
https://www.net-armageddon.org - The official NetEA (Epic Armageddon) site and resource.