zombocom wrote:
And for any other ACs who may have been interested in the already gone positions?
I thought we were going to have a modicum of democracy this time around.
Evil and Chaos wrote:
Quote:
I thought we were going to have a modicum of democracy this time around.
I refuse to break Godwin's law. Sorry, someone else is gonna have to do it.
zombocom wrote:
I'm sure Dave will prove a capable Chair, but I'm a little annoyed that we've jumped straight from "expressions of interest" (with unclear provisions for who is eligible) to 3 roles being appointed without a single moment of public discussion.
Given how open and well-discussed all aspects of development are, it seems weird that we're not allowing any public input into the should be the most important decisions.
Did anyone other than Dave put their names forward? If not, surely a post along the lines of "Only one person has put their name forward, if noone else does he'll be appointed." would have been reasonable? And if other people put their names forward, why didn't we get a choice or at least the option to express our opinions.
This isn't an attack against Dave, and this isn't me wanting the position (I don't), but it's yet another back-room decision, which was the main thing people had problems with under the old system.
*sigh* Seriously? Godwins Law? OK, how about this.... Dave was the only person to put his name forward for this. This is why there was no vote. He was the only candidate, and an appropriate one. Why would it matter to others how many people had volunteered for this? Either someone wanted to put themselves forward, or they didn't, and no-one was aware of even if anyone had, and it shouldn't affect their decision to do so. I fail to see how a 'only one volunteer so far' post would have had any affect aside from muddy the waters.
In addition, if any AC feels that they were held back by the fact that they are an AC and felt that this disqualified them from applying, please feel free to PM me within the next three days (by the end of Sunday). If there is anyone, we will work out a solution then.
The chair was appointed by a self-nomination system. The current NetERC members were asked if they wanted to continue, as there is currently no fixed term for a post. The remaining two posts are open for public volunteering.
Listen, guys, I am happy to take comments and feedback on this, and I don't expect to be able to please everyone here, but I am not sure exactly what kind of a system you are looking for, particularly given the outcry of 'its way more complicated than it needs to be'.
_________________
https://www.cybershadow.ninja - A brief look into my twisted world, including wargames and beyond.
https://www.net-armageddon.org - The official NetEA (Epic Armageddon) site and resource.