Quote:
See, I doubt it's really possible to handle ten-plus lists adroitly.
Just watch me. :-)
Quote:
Also, cutting things back to a few lists gives the supplement some character and a clear objective/theme. At the moment, despite the ostensible focus on War-Machines/Titans, it feels like it's a clearinghouse for surplus Ork lists.
Ostensible is a good word to use, and it's very appropriate.
Yes, I would like to have several different Ork lists, showcasing the different styles of Ork warfare, just as there are to be three Ad-Mech lists showcasing
their different styles of warfare.
Quote:
EDIT: Actually, looking at your post where you listed the lists, a hefty chunk of the Ork lists don't seem to actually exist: Speed Freaks, the Gargant Bigmob and the Grotling Horde are the clearly extant ones. And I'm not sure why we need another generic waaaagh list: what's wrong with the default Ork list?
Speed Freaks, Gargants, Grots,
and Blood Axes all exist.
Of those, all but the Grot list have seen a decent amount of testing.
That only leaves the generic waaagh list, which I want in there to feature some of the units released for the orks in 40k over the last 6 years (since E:A's release). It will have its own drawbacks to balance it (Lack of Gargants, for a start), and as a minor variant list shouldn't be too hard to balance.
Quote:
Perhaps the community should focus (at some point) on creating a supplement kit or a guide to creating supplements, in order to facilitate this?
Desktop publishing software, set some page margins, start writing.
Write for six months, then you're done.
Anyone capable of posting an army list online is capable of writing a supplement project.
It's not lack of know-how that stops people writing supplements, it's lack of time, or more likely, motivation.