You know, I am really quite puzzled by the follow on comments after laying out my concerns (except from TRC). Are we not supposed to be discussing issues, whether real or not? Why all the assurances that there's nothing wrong and just trust us?
If my concern amounts to nothing, it will become self-evident fairly quickly. So let me test this. I've already stated use your own best judgement and nobody is being obligated to follow up on this issue. I did ask for help, that is all.
Given that the Crisis formation is a key component of the list, I would think that a stress test of that component, given the change would be obligatory, at the least.
What is the big deal on this?
Quote:
Honda, you do realize that 11 activations is not a spam list right? Most lists can generate 11 activations if they try, so you wouldn't be out-activating anyone by much at all, so it really just becomes largely a standard force from where I sit. Also, seeing as you went light on the skysweeps I think you're removed part of the issue you had with all the air cover. I'd like to see you play a Marine Air list and a bog-standard Eldar list with this.
Dobbsy, if I threw my intentions off by including the word "spam", then I apologize. In this instance, "Spam" has nothing to do with the number of activations, although it has been used that way, though it seems to me the more commonly used term is "popcorn". I used the term spam to denote the overall content of the list, i.e. nearly all Crisis formations.
Am I really so far out in left field that that is not obvious?
Still, that is one particularly naff formation name 
