Certainly

Of course we're beginning to enter a grey zone but the stuff I've been involved with for EW (with Otterman doing the actual 3d modelling) is clearly a commercial project and should not be regarded as a conversion in any way, unless som personal modifications is made. This is also why I raised the issue with the whole rapid prototyping business going on: It is entirely possible to make professional standard stuff this way. I think we need to figure out some sort of guidelines as to when the standard "creative modelling/scratch build" becomes "too professional". With the way this area has developed over the past year it is bound to become more common in coming years. Otterman, E&C, Jonluke, Nik and Zombo has been producing some amazig stuff lately and it really blows any traditionally sculpted stuff out of the water. It does complicate things, but my spider seneses tell me that at some point it may be nessecary to distinguish between 3d modelling and conventional conversion/scratchbuilds. They are different tools and methods to produce models, perhaps so different that it is difficult to compare them next to one another. Is it more impressive to have a green stuff sculpt of Abaddon or a 3d modelled version in 6mm? I honestly don't know.
One could certainly argue that 3d modelling is just a different variant to milliput and greenstuff that requires skill to master. But on the other hand the virtual model is much easier to perfect than a physical model where shaky hands and the natural limitations of modelling materials result in some degree of luck in order to pull off a good result.
I know it is late and close to the beginning of the comp, but with regards to future EpiComps I think we probably need to discuss where to position this new tool and also make som very clear definitions as to when it should be classified as professional work or personal works sent off to rapid prototyping. Personally i see it as a new tool on par with greenstuff, but at the same time I'd hate to see everyone shift to 3d modelling instead of the simple beauty of conversions based on "good old hands on craftmaship". There should definitely be room for both methods, but they are just so fundamentally different that I find it very difficult to judge the two against each other.
(PS: Posting while drunk, so I apologize typos, weird grammar or general nonsense

)