Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

[BatRep] A Rage of Raveners - Battle 1
Chroma
 Post subject: [BatRep] A Rage of Raveners - Battle 1
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 1:35 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote: (Blish @ 25 Aug. 2009, 08:46 )

I think a few Landers would have helped a great deal against this force.

How do you feel Landas would've helped, Blish?  This testing is supposed to be "blind" in that the non-Tyranid army isn't tuned to specifically fight a "Rage of Raveners" list.

I also believe forces like the Tyranid force above are fairly easy to crush.

Could you expand on this, beacuse I don't see an "easy" answer for dealing with 15 enemy activations.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Chroma
 Post subject: [BatRep] A Rage of Raveners - Battle 1
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 1:41 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote: (Hena @ 25 Aug. 2009, 04:27 )

Chroma, would the idea of synapse per 2 common work too to prevent too pop-corny lists in addition to reduce the amount of % choices in list? It would prevent this one and the suggestions of TRC above.

So would having the lowest Synapse Group cost be 125 points, both for three Warriors or one Hive Tyrant; max of 8 Synapse formations at 3000 points.

I'm not sure about the "2 common" idea, I think that will greatly reduce Tyranid activations and, to me at least, purchasing the Brood creatures before you know how much Synapse you have just sits wrong with me.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
The_Real_Chris
 Post subject: [BatRep] A Rage of Raveners - Battle 1
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 1:44 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 4:45 pm
Posts: 8139
Location: London
Well landas always help :)

Its Great Gargant or landas and airforce for me!

_________________
If using E-Bay use this link to support Tac Com!
'Abolish red trousers?! Never! Red trousers are France!' – Eugene Etienne, War Minister, 1913
"Gentlemen, we may not make history tomorrow, but we shall certainly change the geography."
General Plumer, 191x
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Tiny-Tim
 Post subject: [BatRep] A Rage of Raveners - Battle 1
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 3:21 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 1:32 pm
Posts: 4893
Location: North Yorkshire
Thanks for the report Chroma, its good to see some work still being carried out on this list.

_________________
_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk - home of the UK Epic tournament scene
NetEA NetERC Xenos Lists Chair
NetEA Ork + Feral Ork + Speed Freak Champion
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Blish
 Post subject: [BatRep] A Rage of Raveners - Battle 1
PostPosted: Tue Aug 25, 2009 10:01 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 256
Location: Melbourne Australia
Quote: (Chroma @ 25 Aug. 2009, 13:35 )

Quote: (Blish @ 25 Aug. 2009, 08:46 )

I think a few Landers would have helped a great deal against this force.

How do you feel Landas would've helped, Blish?  This testing is supposed to be "blind" in that the non-Tyranid army isn't tuned to specifically fight a "Rage of Raveners" list.

I just find a one to two Landas are great. With the amount of AP shots(D6+3) and 1At they get are great.

I also try to have say 8boyz, 2Nobz and 4Grots in each Landa
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
stompzilla
 Post subject: [BatRep] A Rage of Raveners - Battle 1
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 3:18 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 8:37 am
Posts: 568
Location: Manchester UK
Because the opponent tended to lead with the Raveners, using terrain to mask/give cover to the Warriors, clustering them to force barrage placement.  To move into a position to get a "clear" shot on Warriors would've meant pushing deep into Tyranid territory, with many other Tyranid activations ready to pounce.


Surely fighta bombers are your friend here.  With a total and complete lack of AA coverage from the nids surely the fightas had free reign of the battlefield and could approach the small swarms from behind to specifically target the TWs?

I agree that these types of popcorn army are not that hard to crush.  I've found that picking on one small fm till it's dead then moving onto another quickly re-balances the activation count, but yours has resilient fms that are much more powerful than the remaining, similar no of "Popcorn" fms.

Landas would have been useful because it provides the Orks the maneuverability to pick on and wipe out these small fms one at a time, while putting pressure on the back line and forcing the nids to fight on two fronts.  If done right, the victorious "Landed mobs" can also provide units to set up some really nasty crossfires and supporting fire.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Chroma
 Post subject: [BatRep] A Rage of Raveners - Battle 1
PostPosted: Thu Aug 27, 2009 3:35 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote: (stompzilla @ 27 Aug. 2009, 15:18 )

Surely fighta bombers are your friend here.  With a total and complete lack of AA coverage from the nids surely the fightas had free reign of the battlefield and could approach the small swarms from behind to specifically target the TWs?

I had two formations of four Fighta-Bommerz and my opponent would often keep the Warriors in cover; on some passes Warriors were killed on others only Blast markers were placed.

Certainly Warriors could be preferentially targetted via aircraft positioning, but each squadron will average about one (point 2, I believe) Warrior(s) per turn, which hardly puts a dent in 30 Warriors.  *laugh*  My planes killed 5 Tyranid Warriors over three turns, so, about right if considering Warriors occasionally in cover.

It was my Stompamob not firing for one turn that actually burned me the most; those attacks could've possibly netted me BTS and would've eliminated Tyranid activations.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net