Quote: (tneva82 @ 02 Jul. 2009, 17:11 )
Quote: (GlynG @ 02 Jul. 2009, 14:06 )
But the real stats are way too over-powered for balanced standard sized tournament play. If you only want to use them properly in scenarios fine, go ahead - but having a reduced version in the tournament list is popular and seems reasonable to me - why so strongly insist those that want it should be prevented? Just don't use it that way yourself.
I fail to see why having them being rare should prevent them being in a list? They do exist, why can they not fight? They're not that rare anyway - there's even one particular titan legion that consists of a dozen of them! Also Imperator Titans are many times more common than Odinati or C'tan - if we follow your logic these would have to be banned much sooner.
They don't make sense to exist in tournament scenarios. Those things are frigging rare and are SUPPOSED to be frigging powerful.
Like the C'tan, of which there are only two in existence?
Or the Avatars of Khaine, of which there are only a couple of dozen?
There are many more Emperor class Titans than either of the above, surely, so rarity doesn't cut it as an argument in this case I think.
Balance and
Representational issues are the two important factors I think?
As it is the "Imperator" in the AMTL list isn't Imperator at all! REAL Imperator wouldn't be so wimpy. It would be LOT more powerful and to hell whether it's good for tournament scenario. If it isn't it's just one more indicator it shouldn't be included in tournament scenario anyway.
If you want to have beefed up warlord fine but atleast don't try to pretend it's Imperator because it most certainly isn't. It's some new titan(as if we need new titans) between warlord and Imperator.