Quote: (Ginger @ 04 Sep. 2008, 12:11 )
I think many / most poeple have been doing a 'like-for-like' comparison excluding the cost of the character. So it would seem that a true cost comparison for the BL Retinue should be 365 points for 8x marines, 4x Rhinos and a Fearless Warlord compared with 350 points for 6x Space marines, 3x Rhinos and a Commander. This would suggest that while the two costs are comparable, the BL are getting 33% more units and firepower in lieu of TSKNF. Put another way, a BL Retinue of 6x marines and leader is ~270 points. For the Chosen, 4x 'termies' and a Fearless Warlord for 260 points compares with 400 points for 4x Termies and a character (under the new costings).
Are we really suggesting that TSKNF is worth around 2/3 the cost or a regular marine unit (comparing the total costs including transport per infantry stand)? Even if we double the 15% suggested by Neal, that still leaves Retinue and Chosen undercosted as much as 20-30% on paper.
However, allowing for the other in-built list restrictions perhaps a modest 10%-15% increase would not be unreasonable making the bare Retinue 300-325 points, and the chosen 70-75 points each.
My '2 cents' as they say
What Fearless Warlord?
The Lords/Warlords aren´t.
The price of the Retinue has remained constant for years, you are pretty much the first one to make an issue of it.
Those "like-for-like" comparisons/guesstimates are rather useless IMO, ATSKNF has such a major and varied impact across various formation sizes and unit types that, combined with the quite different force organisation, the differences between Tacticals and CSM, Devastators and Havocs etc are so extensive that it´s apples and oranges.
Also, to ask directly, why are you content with "free" IG Commissars, the "free" Avatar or free ork "Warlord" but are unwilling to accept "free" Chaos Lords. Where is the difference?
_________________
Visit
www.epic-battles.de the ultimate german epic site&forum!