(Tertius @ Apr. 23 2008,15:34)
QUOTE
I don't consider Epic to be "alive." However, I don't understand the bizarre need of gamers to rely on an all-knowing manufacturer to keep the games they play at home "alive." NetEpic proved to me that the concept of "life" for a gamesystem has nothing to do with its original manufacturer. The players keep a game alive. My local historicals gaming group is notorious for playing 20+ year-old miniatures rulesets, with no concern for their "life" or most recent FAQ or errata. As L4 says: DWWFY. I personally don't care if GW updates the Epic rules. I admit I would like it if they continued to release 6mm figures, but, since they canned the SM2/TL rules, I haven't really liked GW's 6mm sci-fi rules.
I respect Pixelgeek's announcement, but I for one, haven't supported GW in years with Epic. Why? Because it was almost impossible to do so. No local game store carried the figures. I have only seen one copy of the E:A rulebook for sale in a local store, and I have only met one other local E:A player. How did I find him? On TacComms (LordInquisitor)! My point is, to walk away from GW and Epic is kind of meaningless. From my perspective, there is nothing to walk away from.
Hi!
Excellent points Tertius!
I agree that there is nothing to walk away from. Epic has been dead as a marketable, TRULY supported game for about a decade.
I made my choice and support an "epic" independent of GW. I won't support any version GW happens to be pushing, just "because its epic".
GW, can, and has, done whatver they please with epic. It's their game and IP and their right.
My "right" as a consumer is to support... or not.
I choose not too.
I am not alone in this.
Primarch