Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 10 posts ] 

Squats
bama
 Post subject: Squats
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:45 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:18 am
Posts: 2
Location: California
What is the most up to date squat army list for EA and where can I get it?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Evil and Chaos
 Post subject: Squats
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 8:48 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Every existant army list, from experimental up to fully official, can be found on this page:

http://www.tacticalwargames.net/wiki....y+Lists

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Moscovian
 Post subject: Squats
PostPosted: Mon Oct 22, 2007 9:23 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
The demiurg list, despite the fact that the fiction idea was shot down by SG, is probably your best "Squat" list.  Good unit balance and just the right amount of flavor.  I've played against it many times and it feels right.  Some of the others are - well you won't lose with them easily that is for sure. :)

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
TheLimey
 Post subject: Squats
PostPosted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 4:55 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:52 pm
Posts: 182
Location: Miami, Florida
So what is the latest on the Demiurg list?

I ask, because my wife, bless her, fed my Epic addiction with a good sized infantry force of Squats for Xmas. (She told me she lost the bid on the 'nids, but won this one, then woried for days because she then found out that they 'officially' don't exist in 40K any longer).

So, is this list fairly well bedded down now?

_________________
The problem with knowing what we want is we just might get it.

Robert Fripp - DGM

Check out the blog at Chaos in Miami
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
rpr
 Post subject: Squats
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 1:10 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2007 1:32 pm
Posts: 516
Now that I read the Necron list I think the likewise balanced version of Thunderfire in Demiurg list should be something like 3x AA2+ range 120cm  (and still much weaker than Pylon)

(but I?m quite alone in thinking that Necron list has very very broken war engines)
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Crabowl
 Post subject: Squats
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 1:39 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2007 12:44 pm
Posts: 123
Location: Finland

(rpr @ Jan. 04 2008,12:10)
QUOTE
(but I'm almost alone in thinking that Necron list is very very broken)

Fixed

_________________
Gief more guns for less points!
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Moscovian
 Post subject: Squats
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:44 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA

(TheLimey @ Dec. 26 2007,10:55)
QUOTE
So what is the latest on the Demiurg list? ... So, is this list fairly well bedded down now?

I think so.  It has been awhile since I played it but there were few problems with it.  ePlgrim and I are fairly well matched against each other and I saw the Demiurgs lose as often as they won.

Looking back over the list there are some things I'd love to see changed, however.

The new MW barrage rules (making all MW shots on the barrage table hit as AP) unbalances the larger WEs (which all happen to be at the critical BP3).  My guess is they should be dropped to BP2.

Tunneling rule is coherent but after going over it again with fresh eyes I can see why people don't like it - it is unwieldy.  I believe the rules can be simplified while still accomplishing what ePilgrim wanted to do (use the models).

Fiction. As beautifully as it was written it was a gamble on ePilgrim's part that the Demiurg would be the new Squats.  He got a confirmation after submitting the list the Demiurg are most certainly not Squats.  With that said, I think another run at the fiction could be made, keeping them as Squats and removing the Demiurg references (other than maybe as trading partners or allies).

Speed. There are a few units that I don't like being as fast as they are.  Not because of the balance per se but because of the fluff of heavy gravity worlds.  If you lived in a heavy gravity world you most certainly wouldn't have anybody who wanted to go fast.  Falling 10 feet could be a deadly fall!  I also don't like the idea that Gyrocopters would be used on heavy gravity worlds.  Balloons? Yes.  Copters?  Nope.

I think some new units could be added such as those giant city WEs that were put out by... (can't remember right now).  They would make excellent additions to the list.  I'd also like to see mine exits as an option for the Squats (place to exits to a mine to replace objective markers; troops can travel underground in the mine to avoid combat and such, measuring movement as normal.  Something to that effect.

All this I've been throwing at ePilgrim off and on for the last year but with my recent move to Pennsylvania gaming has been at a premium.

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Dwarf Supreme
 Post subject: Squats
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 4:09 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 8:45 pm
Posts: 11149
Location: Canton, CT, USA

(Moscovian @ Jan. 04 2008,09:44)
QUOTE
Fiction. As beautifully as it was written it was a gamble on ePilgrim's part that the Demiurg would be the new Squats.  He got a confirmation after submitting the list the Demiurg are most certainly not Squats.  With that said, I think another run at the fiction could be made, keeping them as Squats and removing the Demiurg references (other than maybe as trading partners or allies).

Fluff-wise I prefer them being Squats, rather than Demiurg.

_________________
"I don't believe in destiny or the guiding hand of fate." N. Peart
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Moscovian
 Post subject: Squats
PostPosted: Fri Jan 04, 2008 6:23 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
He won't change it but I keep poking at him to do it anyway.  The name really isn't the driving force behind the story anyway; it is the genetic experimentation that I think justifies their existence better than the previous gravity-makes-them-shorter fluff.  Take out the Demiurg references, add in more ties to the Imperium to explain the persistence of cross over technology and you're done.  Everything else still meshes well.

Balance wise the list is far better than the Thurgrim's list and the other one (we played them both a couple times and they were ridiculously overpowered).

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
epilgrim
 Post subject: Squats
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:50 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2003 12:28 pm
Posts: 362
Since GW itself now regards the name "Squat" as little more than an unfunny toilet joke, I saw no need to hold to it either.

I based the name Demiurg on the two FW spacecraft and a Jes Goodwin sketch of a short dude in a space suit. I did some research in the Greek mythos of Kthonians and the term Demiurge.

I sprinkled in some sci-fi themes and backed into the xenophobe history of the Imperium and "Squat" was added back only as a pejorative. I am more than content with the fiction, regardless of anyone's opinon.

As for game play, I think they work quite well. I do agree that the tunnelling rules are a bit of a chore, but they were the result of a lot of playtesting and in the end they offer something quite distinct that is not a surefire game winner.

I espcially like that this list has no true armor and offers extreme choices. It encourages balance force selections and rewards combined arms tactics. Next to my IG, this is my favorite army (go figure ?:D )




_________________
Squat/Demiurg Army Co-Champion (in cahoots with Jaldon)
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 10 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net