Tactical Command | View topic

Page 5 of 7

[ 99 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next

View unanswered posts | View active topics View unread posts | View new posts | View your posts

NetEA?

Dave

Post subject: NetEA?

Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 3:48 pm

Hybrid

Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:25 pm
Posts: 9539
Location: Worcester, MA

(nealhunt @ Jul. 26 2007,08:53)

QUOTE

I know everyone likes pdfs, but I am elaning toward making it MSWord because it can use internal hyperlinks to navigate around.

FYI, if you use Open Office you can export to a PDF with internal hyper links to other parts of the PDF.

_________________
Dave

Blog

NetEA Tournament Pack Website

Squats 2019-10-17

Top

mageboltrat

Post subject: NetEA?

Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 7:19 pm

Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:07 pm
Posts: 1015

Also Open Office is free and multi platform, making it easy to transport documents from one creator to another. All they have to do is download the software and they are ready to go.

_________________

My Photobucket

Top

Markconz

Post subject: NetEA?

Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2007 11:22 pm

Purestrain

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: New Zealand

(mageboltrat @ Jul. 26 2007,18:19)

QUOTE

Also Open Office is free and multi platform, making it easy to transport documents from one creator to another. All they have to do is download the software and they are ready to go.

Yes that was my thoughts when I made the handbook using it... :;):

Makes it easier to pass the torch.

It is a bit 'temperamental' at times, but if its machine spirit is nutured with the right incantations and ligations it works out in the end

And it is being upgraded all the time.

_________________
http://hordesofthings.blogspot.co.nz/

Top

CyberShadow

Post subject: NetEA?

Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 2:34 pm

Swarm Tyrant

Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 6:22 pm
Posts: 9350
Location: Singapore

(Moscovian @ Jul. 26 2007,13:48)

QUOTE

CS, what is the current project list we have for updating TacCom, the wiki, etc.

WikiWikiWar

:cool:

_________________
https://www.cybershadow.ninja - A brief look into my twisted world, including wargames and beyond.
https://www.net-armageddon.org - The official NetEA (Epic Armageddon) site and resource.

Top

pixelgeek

Post subject: NetEA?

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 2:50 am

Brood Brother

Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 8:10 pm
Posts: 2642
Location: Edmonton, Alberta

(Moscovian @ Jul. 25 2007,06:55)

QUOTE

Once this infrastructure is built, however, I believe it will be time to vote a new ERC, establish a community ruleset, and start relying on NetEA as the primary support.

I speak from personal experience that this is just going to get a threat of having GW legal going after you.

There are emails being exchanged and hopefully some accomodation can be reached but at the moment I would not move forward with this unless you want a nasty letter from GW Legal.

_________________
Guns don't break formations. Blast Markers break formations.

Top

Moscovian

Post subject: NetEA?

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:03 am

Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA

PG,

I didn't quite follow your post. Are you saying this with a general warning or do you know of any inside info that would indicate GW specifically does not want this particular thing to happen and they are talking about it.

If it was the latter I'd actually be impressed!

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.

Top

nealhunt

Post subject: NetEA?

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 1:43 pm

Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA

I'll say that I now have some more present concerns than in the past. I've stated multiple times that GW's IP people are very leery about the fan-based development for SG. Evidence is pointing to their legal department getting itchy trigger fingers.

_________________
Neal

Top

J0k3r

Post subject: NetEA?

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 2:37 pm

Brood Brother

Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 11:18 pm
Posts: 876
Location: Edinburgh, UK

I dont know if you are at liberty to go into any greater detail Neal, but chancing my arm here I assume they would only get annoyed about alternative core rules?

The thing that always worries me is where fans include SG written text in new documents. Is that the case or is it likely that reaction will be against wider development of the rules- ie changing and disseminating anything that is GW IP could be construed as breaking copyright.

_________________
"Do not offend the Chair Leg of Truth; it is wise and terrible."
-Spider Jerusalem

Top

Evil and Chaos

Post subject: NetEA?

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 2:46 pm

Brood Brother

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire

(nealhunt @ Jul. 31 2007,13:43)

QUOTE

I guess now is not the best time for me to announce that the Siege of Mossino / Death Korps suppliment is within days of completion then?

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter

Top

nealhunt

Post subject: NetEA?

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:30 pm

Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA

I don't want to give out details unless the people involved are doing so.

E&C: I seriously doubt such a thing is a problem. In the worst case scenario, you agree to submit it to Fanatic. That gives GW copyright and, assuming Andy prints it, public distribution like you want.

_________________
Neal

Top

J0k3r

Post subject: NetEA?

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:34 pm

Brood Brother

Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 11:18 pm
Posts: 876
Location: Edinburgh, UK

(nealhunt @ Jul. 31 2007,16:30)

QUOTE

I don't want to give out details unless the people involved are doing so.

Fairy snuff, I suspected that was the case. Anyway, thanks for the heads up- much appreciated by all im sure

_________________
"Do not offend the Chair Leg of Truth; it is wise and terrible."
-Spider Jerusalem

Top

Dwarf Supreme

Post subject: NetEA?

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 4:52 pm

Brood Brother

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 8:45 pm
Posts: 11149
Location: Canton, CT, USA

(nealhunt @ Jul. 31 2007,08:43)

QUOTE

I'll say that I now have some more present concerns than in the past. ?I've stated multiple times that GW's IP people are very leery about the fan-based development for SG. ?Evidence is pointing to their legal department getting itchy trigger fingers.

But isn't Epic's current development entirely fan-based?

_________________
"I don't believe in destiny or the guiding hand of fate." N. Peart

Top

pixelgeek

Post subject: NetEA?

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:05 pm

Brood Brother

Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 8:10 pm
Posts: 2642
Location: Edmonton, Alberta

(nealhunt @ Jul. 31 2007,08:30)

QUOTE

I don't want to give out details unless the people involved are doing so.

I have had a text version of the Epic rules kicking around for some time (for another project) that has all the GW IP removed from it.

I started a Wiki and started entering the rules text (I'm up to 1.10) with the expectation that it would be used to publish the new rules review changes and act as an updated and current version of the rules that you could actually link to.

This URL was sent to the ERC and Andy for comment and Andy's comment was that I would have to shut it down as it would get a response from GW's legal department.

I then said that GW should do the same thing then.

Andy said they didn't have the resources.

I replied that it was ridiculous that they didn't have the resources to do the project but would have the resources to threaten to sue me if I did it on my own.

Neal jumped in to try to defuse the situation by suggesting that GW Legal could give us some sort of dispensation to do the project and that is where is stands. Andy hasn't replied and I am going to assume that if I make the site public I will get a legal note and a possible DMCA takedown notice that will remove my site from my ISPs servers.

I would assume that any public attempt to do so by any other party would result in the same legal threats.

_________________
Guns don't break formations. Blast Markers break formations.

Top

Dave

Post subject: NetEA?

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:08 pm

Hybrid

Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:25 pm
Posts: 9539
Location: Worcester, MA

(Dwarf Supreme @ Jul. 31 2007,11:52)

QUOTE

But isn't Epic's current development entirely fan-based?

I believe so, but there's still someone at GW that has to put the stamp of approval on it. Like NH said, this gives them copyright and ownership of the document.

_________________
Dave

Blog

NetEA Tournament Pack Website

Squats 2019-10-17

Top

pixelgeek

Post subject: NetEA?

Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2007 5:08 pm

Brood Brother

Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 8:10 pm
Posts: 2642
Location: Edmonton, Alberta

To say that I am pissed off is an understatement.

Its a ridiculous Catch-22. They don't want to support the game but don't try to do it on your own as they will sue you.

Wankers.

_________________
Guns don't break formations. Blast Markers break formations.

Top

Print view

Previous topic | Next topic

Page 5 of 7

[ 99 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Next

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:

NetEA?

Who is online