Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 2
  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Why the differences in army lists?
javelin98
 Post subject: Why the differences in army lists?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 5:52 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:39 am
Posts: 791
Location: Spokane, WA, USA
In building my army-builder spreadsheet, I've found that I have to make the functionality of the three factions I have (SM, IG, and Ork) different for each faction.

* Marines have Detachments that can have Upgrades.

* IG have Companies, which can have two Support Formations and three Upgrades.

* Orks have Types, three formation Sizes, and Extras.

What on earth...?  Of the three, the IG are the most straightforward and the Orks are the most complex.  And it just seems silly that each of the three should be entirely different than the others.  Programatically, it's a pain in the tush.  My Excel-fu is strong, but I do wish the Powers That Be had seen fit to come up with one method of structuring all army lists that would have been standardised and logical but would also allow the flavor of each race/faction to come through.

And I haven't even looked at the Chaos or Eldar lists yet... who knows what dark maelstrom their alien minds will conjure up in the name of army-list order.

_________________
Set phasers on "fun"!
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Evil and Chaos
 Post subject: Why the differences in army lists?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:05 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Eldar are entertainingly complex. :)


I quite like the different armylist structures.

It means that:

- Marines can pick whatever they like (The right scalpel for the right operation)

- Orks get discounts the larger their formations get, and the variety of formations that can be built is very varied (You really get the sense that the list was designed with the chaotic nature of an Ork army in mind)

- The IG have a nice 'operational' list structure, that means if you want rare units you have to take a solid core first in order for the 'hq' to deem your force large enough to be worth attaching expensive rare assets.

- The Tyranids can build practically any list structure they like, as long as they have Synapse creatures, because 'nid swarms are incredibly varied in the background.

- etc.



So basically, I prefer Epic's freeform list construction to Warhammer Fantasy's constrained (although balanced) Core/Special/Rare formula, or Warhammer 40k's absurdly dumb Force Organisational charts (Which do not scale, so all tournament games of 40k should be not 500points distant from 1500pts or the system just breaks down daftly).

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
colonel_sponsz
 Post subject: Why the differences in army lists?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:12 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 6:14 pm
Posts: 390
if you don't like those, don't look at the Tau...  :alien:

I made a random army generator using PHP, which is a full programming language, and it was still a real mess.  I can't begin to imagine how much of cluster funk that would be in Excel :(

Orde

_________________
"I'm smelling a whole lot of 'if' coming off this plan."

Tau Army List Archive
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Dwarf Supreme
 Post subject: Why the differences in army lists?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:15 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 8:45 pm
Posts: 11147
Location: Canton, CT, USA

(Evil and Chaos @ Jan. 31 2007,12:05)
QUOTE
I quite like the different armylist structures.

As do I. I think it's a good way of giving each army more character.

_________________
"I don't believe in destiny or the guiding hand of fate." N. Peart
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Lord Inquisitor
 Post subject: Why the differences in army lists?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:25 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 7:20 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Norfolk VA USA

(javelin98 @ Jan. 31 2007,11:52)
QUOTE
What on earth...? ?Of the three, the IG are the most straightforward and the Orks are the most complex.

Funny, I've always thought the Imperial Guard army list the least easy to follow of the three. The distinction of Company Upgrades (added to a Company), and Support Formations (totally independent from the Companies) isn't that obvious. Not that you need a phd to follow it, but I don't agree that the orks are the most complex - you have each formation and what upgrades it can have in one table... easy!
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Evil and Chaos
 Post subject: Why the differences in army lists?
PostPosted: Wed Jan 31, 2007 6:29 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
I'd say the Marines are the simplest army list, all formation sizes are pre-set (No messing with Mob, Big Mob, 'Uge mob), and the list of upgrades is simple and low in number (Unlike the IG which has quite a variety of upgrades and upgrade types).

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Markconz
 Post subject: Why the differences in army lists?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 12:32 am 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 10:43 pm
Posts: 7925
Location: New Zealand
I agree that the different types of lists are important to give each army character, just not so good when you are trying to Excel them.

A database of spreadship types made by generous users prepared to share them could be helpful for people perhaps? (hint, hint :;):)

_________________
http://hordesofthings.blogspot.co.nz/
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Lord Inquisitor
 Post subject: Why the differences in army lists?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 12:37 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 7:20 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Norfolk VA USA

(Hena @ Jan. 31 2007,12:29)
QUOTE
Actually simplest IMO is Marines. Only formations and upgrades.

Never said they weren't...  :p
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
javelin98
 Post subject: Why the differences in army lists?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 12:49 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:39 am
Posts: 791
Location: Spokane, WA, USA
I've already written up the IG sheet, which was the easiest by far.  The Marine sheet is killing me -- I'm trying to incorporate all the different possible upgrades -- up to two Vindicators or four Land Raiders and a Commander, etc., etc.  I've been using data validation to make drop-down boxes, but the problem is using the IF() function in a data validation forumla is limited to seven nested IF's, and I need eleven or so.  Grrr...

_________________
Set phasers on "fun"!
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Legion 4
 Post subject: Why the differences in army lists?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 6:22 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm
Posts: 36984
Location: Ohio - USA
Don't like the E:A Army lists/method ... we use a hybrid system based mostly on SM1 Templates/TO&Es ...   The E:A are a bit convoluted, IMO !

_________________
Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
CyberShadow
 Post subject: Why the differences in army lists?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:49 am 
Swarm Tyrant
Swarm Tyrant
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 6:22 pm
Posts: 9348
Location: Singapore

(javelin98 @ Jan. 31 2007,23:49)
QUOTE
I've already written up the IG sheet, which was the easiest by far. ?The Marine sheet is killing me -- I'm trying to incorporate all the different possible upgrades -- up to two Vindicators or four Land Raiders and a Commander, etc., etc. ?I've been using data validation to make drop-down boxes, but the problem is using the IF() function in a data validation forumla is limited to seven nested IF's, and I need eleven or so. ?Grrr...

Have you dealt with the thorny issue of replacing transport Rhinos with Razorbacks as well?  :)

And, I dont think that the Tau organisation is complicated... it is pretty much the same as the IG, except for the auxiliaries.
:alien:

_________________
https://www.cybershadow.ninja - A brief look into my twisted world, including wargames and beyond.
https://www.net-armageddon.org - The official NetEA (Epic Armageddon) site and resource.
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
javelin98
 Post subject: Why the differences in army lists?
PostPosted: Thu Feb 01, 2007 2:33 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 6:39 am
Posts: 791
Location: Spokane, WA, USA

(CyberShadow @ Feb. 01 2007,01:49)
QUOTE
Have you dealt with the thorny issue of replacing transport Rhinos with Razorbacks as well? ?:)

I have, although it brought up a good question.  Devastators can upgrade to both Razorbacks and Land Raiders... so could they potentially take four Razorbacks (since the standard loadout for a Devastator formation would be two Rhinos, which have double the capacity of Razorbacks) and four Land Raiders as well (since the wording of the upgrade is "add" and not "replace").  Is that correct, or am I reading that wrong?

And I guess I see what everyone is saying -- the different army list structures do indeed give the different factions flavor.  But they're a pain in the butt from a programming standpoint!

_________________
Set phasers on "fun"!
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 2
  [ 25 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net