![]() ![]() |
Page 2 of 2 |
[ 20 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1, 2 |
** New Update - Black Legion 3.5 available |
||||||||
pixelgeek |
|
|||||||
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 8:10 pm Posts: 2642 Location: Edmonton, Alberta |
|
|||||||
Top | |
|||||||
![]() |
Tactica |
|
||||
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am Posts: 2241 |
|
||||
Top | |
||||
![]() |
Tactica |
|
||||
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am Posts: 2241 |
I'm not in disagreement with you, but the fact that it can happen is the potential for problem. The fact that it can underperform doesn't make it a problem. Only the fact that it can and eventually will overperform. That is not a statistical fallacy, just an extreme result of the potential. Regarding the math that you provide, in theory I don't disagree. However, there are other variables at play that impact this formation. This is a 6 sided dice game and not a 10 sided dice game, percentile fractions have an interesting affect on the number crunching. Also, your math does not account for the fact that this is an activation based game where amount of firepower/movement per activation is quite relative. It doesn't account for the type of unit we are talking about either. If an IG army requires you to take a company for every two auxilary and you only get 1/3 of your points in titans - those points come at a premium as they allow you to alter your army comp in unique and interesting ways. In a category of unit that is restricted to 1/3 of the army max - it can have a higher value than a typical formation if it's extremely mobile, significantly resiliant, and can deliver significant amount of firepower. Further increases in firepower are potentially more valuable in this limited class of unit by comparison to the normal units in the army. Especially when apposing armies do not have access to the same level of firepower in comparable sized formations/units. Does all this mean the Feral should be 75 instead of 50 - absolutely not. I've not played against this new 3.5 list, so just saying I have some concerns. Regards to the blast markers and additional distance you can get out of them compared to a flame template and the macro-weapon ability the Ferals get by comparison to the AMTL lighter weapon variants - I didn't see any response. Ultimately, if the Feral can have the ignore cover / macro weapon 3bp blast - I don't see why the AMTL warhound can't. That's a decision for Dysartes and the AMTL guys to mull over though I suppose. _________________ Rob |
The_Real_Chris |
|
||||
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 4:45 pm Posts: 8139 Location: London |
|
||||
Top | |
||||
![]() |
Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
![]() ![]() |
Page 2 of 2 |
[ 20 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1, 2 |
Who is online |
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |