Legion 4 wrote:
+psypher+ wrote:
Some rely too much on camouflage. I'll always remember the time we were on an exercise with a bunch of American specials. Idea was for them to infiltrate a station up on the coast, plant mock charges and exfiltrate to their RV. I have to say, their camo was good for the inland scrub area....but considering the exercise was carried out near a coastal area, they didn't last 5 mins before 10 RAF military police in land rovers and on foot picked them off before they reached 200 yards of the station. Quickest exercise ive ever seen....lesson learned by them...proper planning and deployment needed!

You'll always find an exception ... again, based on my experience camo, cover & concealment ... works and will work in the future. Whether that will be true or not ... we'll just have to wait and see ...
Don't get me wrong, I concur that camo, cover and concealment works very well (and always will do) for various elements of warfare. However, I don't believe having everything camo'd up and that in many conflicts, basic monotone/two tone drab colours work just as well.
Im of the same ilk as you are re- drab colours for armies, however there is something about the fantasy universe that brings out the adventurous side that wants to paints space marines in fancy bold colours....an escape from realism for me. I must add that I was painting model soldiers as a kid in wacky colours, pretending to fight on mars and the moon long before I saw any GW minis or fluff

.
Im liking your minis you e posted, especially the proper 'Dark' Angels btw.

_________________
Battlescene Designs - Building Better Worlds (in miniature)
Can be found on:
Facebook -
http://www.facebook.com/Battlescenedesignshttp://www.battlescenedesigns.co.uk