I think that this blog reflects my views pretty well:
http://thefrontlinegamer.blogspot.co.uk ... games.htmlThere are no good guys, aside from the customers who bought goods without realising the issues (those who bought and did suspect took a gamble knowingly).
Maelstrom clearly attempted to run up way too much credit and were not sensible with their book keeping. It appears that they attempted to stretch too far in too many directions, and forgot that they are a retail business first and foremost. They neglected their customer base, and took advantage of their suppliers. It was never going to end well, and even then they appear to be at best blind, and at worst attempting to take orders that they were fully aware they could not fill.
Simple Miniatures extended credit beyond what they could or should do.
Weyland is an interesting case. My own (unfounded) suspicion is that they were partly protecting their supply (I assume that if Simple Miniatures went down or suffered issues because they had extended credit to Maelstrom that they couldnt function with, Weyland would be disadvantaged too). However, a lot of it appears to be stronghand tactics to drive down the value of a business and attempt a buy-out (with the knowledge that any strongarm tactics that Maelstrom didnt submit to would like have exactly this consequence and remove a large competitor), which they admit they tried previously. Its fairly established business practice to devalue a business and put pressure on them to sell up. Then again, Maelstrom should never have put themselves in that vulnerable position.
There are no winners here.
_________________
https://www.cybershadow.ninja - A brief look into my twisted world, including wargames and beyond.
https://www.net-armageddon.org - The official NetEA (Epic Armageddon) site and resource.