@zombocom and others with thoughts on the list: is it terribly over-powered, terribly underpowered, or either/both depending on the mission? @Spectrar Ghost was kind enough to offer an analysis of the list I had in mind in a thread for the Adepticon tourney (
link here) in the context of the different missions available in E:A, so perhaps some of these (or similar) underlie your comments?
In the alternative, are there structural problems with the unit (costing or weapons power) that ought to be addressed... or is it more balanced at certain (perhaps much higher points-level) games? I've no wish to build a WAAC ("win at any costs") list, but simply thought it would be an interesting novelty to field two of these and not much else. I haven't yet seen an AMTL list draft with a 0-1 Emperor-class limit, nor have I seen any "1 Emperor Class Titan per x (e.g. 2000) points". Likewise, they don't seem to appear as allies on the Ministorum and Inquisition lists, which (as I recall) is where they were assigned in some of the fluff (though I do recall the Dark Mechanicus Emperor-class titan in Abnett's
Titanicus, and Lexicanum yields a few mentions of loyalist Emperor-class titans, including a picture of a painted example from Legio Metalica that appeared on the "Titan Legions" box and in White Dwarf).
Back to my original point, is there a rationale surrounding putting the Lysander as a support choice rather than a unit upgrade? The Warmonger seems to have a pretty unique list structure to have an unlocked-by-unit add-on consume the very support choice it grants (though I'll admit to only looking at three or four lists from the 2012 document and a few of the other AMTL lists floating around the board). Is this intended to counter-balance a too-powerful unit?