Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 122 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9  Next

Consolidated view so far

 Post subject: Consolidated view so far
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:31 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 4499
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Here is where my gut feelings have me right now. I know they are probably more changes than some would like to see if they're implemented but i feel that these working together might actually make a lot more things viable and reduce the cookie-cutter somewhat.

That said, it's not an absolute choice just yet, however, as I'd like to discuss whether they can all work together or just the armour and Tactical ideas. Personally, I think they might work as one but I'll leave it to discussion to see what comes up.

Thanks guys.

1/ Land Raider 325 points - a conservative start but I would like to see it drop to 300 if the Warhound proposal below is not implemented.

2/ Vindicator - 225 points. 50 point upgrade. A +5 cm movement would be good for the upgrades but I'm still trying to decide if it could work alongside the price drop. This is a late idea but what about a 3+FF instead? Would it be warranted? It's an awfully big shell....

3/ Predators - flat 250 (FF3+ for Pred D incorporated after the discussion thread for the preds a while back) - I want to be conservative with this change (i.e. no 225 for 4 D's) even knowing that there's a good chance they don't equal a WH. Plus, it's just easier to price them the same to start with.

4/ Tacticals - confirm 275 and LR upgrade option

5/ Warhounds - 550 - a pair with no discount. You still get to use them but you don't get 2 pairs. I'm still debating on 500 though but I'm siding with 550 more atm. EDIT - No singletons available for purchase at all.

These next options are possibly for a later date but I wanted to put them out there for this discussion.

Thunderbolts 175 - proposed by Dave Thomas a while back and in league with the Warhound change so you won't get 3 squadrons (basically a +1 activation boost) and your Warhounds.

Warlord 825? - Mainly as an option to still allow 1 Thunderbolt Sdn in addition to a Warlord choice. This idea is a bit new but I remember TRC asking to keep the option for both viable when the TBs were discussed a while back and it seems fair to me. Also E&C proposed the idea recently.

Scouts - add the LSS for testing at the very least. No price change but possible removal of the Razorback but I'm still undecided on that. This is all still in my "possibly don't bother" basket even though it's a more fluffy option and I like the idea.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Consolidated view so far
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:36 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:20 pm
Posts: 5483
Location: London, UK
My immediate gut reaction is - "too many changes to work simultaneously, and too far too fast".

Also, are you banning singlton Warhounds altogether? If so, the 50 point hike to Warhound pairs is unwarranted - it is the singltons that are abusive / unfluffy, not the pairs which are rarely if ever used.

That said, how do you propose to test these proposals objectively, especially as there are so many entrenched positions?


Last edited by Ginger on Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Consolidated view so far
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:45 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 4499
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Well I can't force people to trial it but I'll be trialling them myself as much as possible and I'd hope many others would too. If needs be, trial one change at a time in your playing groups.... <shrug>

The first 5 don't add up to that many changes and minimal adjustments at that(perhaps excluding the WH change). The second part of the proposals, like I said, can wait to a later date but I think if anyone wants to trial them alongside then please do so and I'll sing your praises. :)

Not all the mentioned formations go in everyone's lists anyway from what I can see.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Consolidated view so far
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:47 am 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 1:32 pm
Posts: 4893
Location: North Yorkshire
Ginger wrote:
My immediate gut reaction is - "too many changes to work simultaneously, and too far too fast".

That said, how do you propose to test these proposals objectively, especially as there are so many entrenched positions?

Bring along the 'Ignore Cover' weaponry of course.

On a topic note. Interesting and as Ginger says that's a lot of changes.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Consolidated view so far
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:50 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 4499
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Tiny-Tim wrote:
On a topic note. Interesting and as Ginger says that's a lot of changes.

Tim, when you say "interesting," do you mean it's "interesting-possible" or "interesting-stuff that!" :D


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Consolidated view so far
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 10:55 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
I'm largely happy to test those changes.

Things I don't like:
- raising the cost of warhound pairs (they are fine at 500 IMO)
- ff3+ vindicators (not needed)
- 30cm speed vindicators (not needed)

I think 800 may be a better price point for the warlord, but 825 is a good start.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Consolidated view so far
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:01 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 4499
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Evil and Chaos wrote:
Things I don't like:
- raising the cost of warhound pairs (they are fine at 500 IMO)
- ff3+ vindicators (not needed)
- 30cm speed vindicators (not needed)

Gotcha. Re: WHs - the aim is to reduce the option of too many WHs but if the Thunderbolt change goes in 500 could still work. You'll still end up with 2 WH formations for your 1000 points of course w/o TBs.

Re: vindicators these are just options I'm looking for further discussion on, but points all taken. ;)

Evil and Chaos wrote:
I think 800 may be a better price point for the warlord, but 825 is a good start.

Baby steps is a better start on the big fella.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Consolidated view so far
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:08 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:01 pm
Posts: 2518
Location: California
Dobbsy wrote:
1/ Land Raider 325 points - a conservative start but I would like to see it drop to 300 if the Warhound proposal below is not implemented.

2/ Vindicator - 225 points. 50 point upgrade. A +5 cm movement would be good for the upgrades but I'm still trying to decide if it could work alongside the price drop. This is a late idea but what about a 3+FF instead? Would it be warranted? It's an awfully big shell....

3/ Predators - flat 250 (FF3+ for Pred D incorporated after the discussion thread for the preds a while back) - I want to be conservative with this change (i.e. no 225 for 4 D's) even knowing that there's a good chance they don't equal a WH. Plus, it's just easier to price them the same to start with.

4/ Tacticals - confirm 275 and LR upgrade option

5/ Warhounds - 550 - a pair with no discount. You still get to use them but you don't get 2 pairs. I'm still debating on 500 though but I'm siding with 550 more atm.


1) I guess so, don't see 350 as a issue if there now FF4+ which I don't think have seen much action?
2) Sounds good as Prices go but does it really need a speed boost? And FF3? I think people would riot?
3) Sounds good. Upgrade 2 Pred A's for X points still I assume? And the price is?
4) 275 sounds right but I'm not convince either way about the LR upgrade for them.
5)What?!?!? I fairly certain the issue is with Single Warhounds and not pairs! 500 for a pair is fine and 275 for a single is fine however singles should be restricted to 0-1 option per fluff and balance wise. I think everyone moaning about the Warhound list aided my SM would go away as you would see less Warhound Spam


Dobbsy wrote:
These next options are possibly for a later date but I wanted to put them out there for this discussion.

Thunderbolts 175 - proposed by Dave Thomas a while back and in league with the Warhound change so you won't get 3 squadrons (basically a +1 activation boost) and your Warhounds.

Warlord 825? - Mainly as an option to still allow 1 Thunderbolt Sdn in addition to a Warlord choice. This idea is a bit new but I remember TRC asking to keep the option for both viable when the TBs were discussed a while back and it seems fair to me. Also E&C proposed the idea recently.

Scouts - add the LSS for testing at the very least. No price change but possible removal of the Razorback but I'm still undecided on that. This is all still in my "possibly don't bother" basket even though it's a more fluffy option and I like the idea.

First starter I DO NOT like the idea of random price changes on units in different list in general let alone for minor reasons. I know people say it doesn't matter or what not but it bothers me and is a petpev so I'm against it. DO T-Bolts really need a price boost? I doubt it but if they do then they need it in all lists. As for the Warlord I don't see a need for a price reduction but I'm not against it either, but I would want it to be a change across the lists. So either one of those changes will need other AC's and the ERC IMHO.

As for the LSS I think it a good idea to add but it should replace the Razorback. Leave the rhino for old armies already built and it a possible option fluff wise but Razor's make little sense to be given to Noobie SM.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Consolidated view so far
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:13 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 12:52 pm
Posts: 4262
Other than the warhound's I could live with them. Still not sure most of the changes are required.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Consolidated view so far
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:15 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Thunderbolts and warlords could change price in this list and not other lists. It's all about context.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Consolidated view so far
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:16 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
Mephiston wrote:
Other than the warhound's I could live with them. Still not sure most of the changes are required.

You're pretty unlikely to play against the NetEA marine list so that's okay. :-)

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Consolidated view so far
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:17 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:01 pm
Posts: 2518
Location: California
Evil and Chaos wrote:
Thunderbolts and warlords could change price in this list and not other lists. It's all about context.

I know the reasons and hear them I just don't buy it for the most part. :P

Plus it makes my brain hurt if I'm writing a Imperial list on the fly and I have to think how much a Warhound or Thunderbolt costs in said list.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Consolidated view so far
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:24 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
When I exercise my muscles and they hurt, that's the feeling of them growing larger :-p

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Consolidated view so far
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:30 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:01 pm
Posts: 2518
Location: California
Evil and Chaos wrote:
When I exercise my muscles and they hurt, that's the feeling of them growing larger :-p

That's fine when I'm at the gym! Not my gaming group! =P


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Consolidated view so far
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:02 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 5682
Location: Australia
I am willing to try the proposed changes, however I do not believe the Tacticals need a LR transport choice.

Then again, you are not going to please everyone. :P

_________________
Frogbear is responsible for...
Previous World Eaters
Previous Emperor's Children
Previous Death Guard
Previous Imperial Fists
Previous Chaos Squats


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 122 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 9  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net