Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 142 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 10  Next

The netERC

 Post subject: Re: The netERC
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 12:32 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 4499
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Ulrik wrote:
What's the system for playtesting? I tried to provide some feedback on the Nid list (and it did restart the spawning discussion), but there's no way I know of to provide feedback other than starting threads here on the forum. Seems pretty disorganized, and not something I'd really do until I had played something like a dozen game with a list. Wouldn't it be better to have a system to gather feedback from a larger number of players, or is it better to only trust Feedback from people who have played a list a lot?

Chroma has provided a handy batrep recording sheet for just that purpose. I'll try and find the link for you Ulrik.

Quote:
How about ACs that do not even provide a batrep for their own list?

As most ACs all have different approaches to one another that's a fair approach IMO. Some prefer to let others play their list to gain objective feedback or it might look overbearing or the like; others like to get involved completely; others do a bit of both. <shrug> Just because they may not do something at the pace we would like doesn't mean they need to get tossed on their ear.

Quote:
I provided quite a few playtest feedback for Nids 9.2.1 and also opened quite a few discussions after quite a few games to help move the list along - all of which amounted to silence and excuses.

Sure and that's a good thing, but one person's feedback is still minimal feedback. Hardly much to base a list change on is it? They may look like excuses to some but to others (particularly the AC in this case) they may not share your view so discussion continues.

Quote:
Also painting a base or 1 squad for the 'best' playtest is not really inviting. Paint up a whole army for someone and you may just see some results. It's much like offering a $1 for a batrep. Not really worth the time to do it.

:D And that's my point - player apathy. Is it any wonder lists take so log to finalise? It sometimes seems some want lists to be done overnight but put in no effort to help, themselves. In reality a batrep is a bit of writing on the forum with possible pictures that might take you an hour or so and helps flesh out an army that you may like to play. And c'mon Frogbear, you know from your own experience that a fully converted and well painted miniature takes hours, perhaps days - I even offered the minis! :D Is that not a fair trade for a bit of effort on a simple batrep...?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: The netERC
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 12:36 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:49 am
Posts: 5569
I think we've gone a little off-topic. I'm just asking about the netERC, not the ACs at this stage. Most lists seem to have fairly regular attending ACs at the moment, and those lists that have been abandoned are generally being replaced by the "free market".

It's the netERC I'm worried about, as it seems to have effectively ceased to exist.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: The netERC
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 12:38 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 4499
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Sorry Zombo.

Ulrik - here you go:
http://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd/download/file.php?id=140


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: The netERC
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 2:21 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
Let's just wait till school is out before we declare the NetERC null & void, shall we? Give people a chance to catch up, breathe, and get back into the swing of things. I think we'll be fine and all this will be water under the bridge by summer.

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: The netERC
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 2:33 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:49 am
Posts: 5569
Mosc: At minimum a replacement for Hena needs to be picked.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: The netERC
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 2:49 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Posts: 6414
Location: Allentown, Pennsylvania USA
I agree. I actually think Chroma won't return, which means he'll need replacing. My gut is telling me Neal is a little strung out and may step down, although he has said nothing. All these things need to be dealt with. I just think, given the volunteer status of the NetERC and the friendships we've formed on here, that they deserve some time to sort things out. Dobbsy was right when he said something to the effect of it not costing us anything.

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: The netERC
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 3:00 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
At this point I'd say it's Neal's choice as to where to go next, and I'm happy to give him the time to make up his mind as to what the process will be.

Neal is an extremely capable member of the community, and if he's got other pressures working on him right now it's only understandable.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: The netERC
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 9:52 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 5682
Location: Australia
Moscovian wrote:
Dobbsy was right when he said something to the effect of it not costing us anything.


Incorrect!

Posts, general commitment and attendance at these boards is quite low from what they were in the days of 9.2.1 and Tau discussions. If anything, the contribution to this site has waned significantly. Apart from this discussion, I (and many others for that fact) really have not found anything to contribute to and find other sites and games to play.

I suspect that the only reason we still have the small community at this stage is because of the investment people have placed into the game itself. That in itself will not last forever.

Defending the state of where we are and making excuses (the same that have existed for several years now) is really not getting us anywhere. There is no point to all this if there is no behaviour change. How long has it been that an army book and central site has been in the works? Volunteer does not mean we make excuses and things take time - not when there is a plethora of other people willing and waiting to take it to the next level.

_________________
Frogbear is responsible for...
Previous World Eaters
Previous Emperor's Children
Previous Death Guard
Previous Imperial Fists
Previous Chaos Squats


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: The netERC
PostPosted: Wed May 25, 2011 11:58 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 4499
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Evil and Chaos wrote:
At this point I'd say it's Neal's choice as to where to go next, and I'm happy to give him the time to make up his mind as to what the process will be.

Neal is an extremely capable member of the community, and if he's got other pressures working on him right now it's only understandable.

Agreed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: The netERC
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 4:36 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 11:34 pm
Posts: 427
its interesting reading this thread in relation to making forward progress.
then you skip back a few years and read threads in related matters and it all just sounds excatly the same with still no forward motion. For things to proceed forward it would appear change is ineveitable, and the counter to that is that people seem tofear change.
Maybe a NetANZ isnt a bad idea , look at france it worked for them, and theres lots of benefits and downsides to it aswell, but at the end of the day after all the forums and threads are dead and the NetERC disbands or what ever may come, people will still have there own play groups that use there own rules / lits/ house rules, so the only one real major aspect of the community other than having international trade options is to try and adhere a international rules system, and as far as i can see there isnt one.
Just my 2 cents worth, but id really love to see a one rules system / armies lists for all , it would make reading battle reps, and other feed back more revelant and i think it would do alot for the game to have everyone on the same page.

Tim NZ


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: The netERC
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 5:08 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2008 1:50 am
Posts: 835
Tim_nz wrote:
Just my 2 cents worth, but id really love to see a one rules system / armies lists for all , it would make reading battle reps, and other feed back more revelant and i think it would do alot for the game to have everyone on the same page.

I'd also like to see a unified direction with regards army lists. One of the things that's been a personal annoyance over the years is a lack of consistency with regard "40Kification". It seems like the move is towards making Epic an extension of 40K, with list updates dependent on the latest Codex. But this criteria isn't used universally. Either approach is fine with me (though I have a preference for not following 40K), but I feel a single direction is important. Other lists can be listed as either Archaic (if a latest and greatest position is taken) or Codexed (if a more 'old skool' position).

Just my thoughts.

Morgan Vening


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: The netERC
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 5:23 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 5682
Location: Australia
zombocom wrote:
At minimum a replacement for Hena needs to be picked.


I am going to say it and get it out of the way.

For what it's worth, the people that I feel are most suitable for any replacement on the NetERC are as follows in no particular order of preference:
- Evil & Chaos
- Markconz
- Zombocom
- Simulated Knave

_________________
Frogbear is responsible for...
Previous World Eaters
Previous Emperor's Children
Previous Death Guard
Previous Imperial Fists
Previous Chaos Squats


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: The netERC
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 6:02 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2005 1:24 am
Posts: 4499
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Quote:
id really love to see a one rules system / armies lists for all

Agreed. So a NetANZ only drives this further from possibility correct?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: The netERC
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 6:13 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:01 pm
Posts: 2518
Location: California
Dobbsy wrote:
Quote:
id really love to see a one rules system / armies lists for all

Agreed. So a NetANZ only drives this further from possibility correct?

That what it sounds like to me. I didn't think the French system was all that used or good? But I prefer one worldwide system. I mean if ever made it to England to play Epic it would be for MoK Winter Warmer or something similar. The idea of countries having there own rule sets/army lists seems pointless, silly and slightly arrogant. The Main GW games aren't like that or even the other SG games.

As for ERC replacements....E&C or Simulated Knave sounds like fine choices. Also think that ERC members shouldn't be Core Lists AC's. I mean subs for variants lists awesome but I think balance and time issue makes it a better idea to have Race AC's and ERC members to be different folks.

Also I agree we should give till late June before we start demanding results. Ending semesters and graduations really fill the next few weeks and I understand the need for some patience but I would like to see the Army Book up no later than July 1st.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: The netERC
PostPosted: Thu May 26, 2011 6:58 am 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Wed Sep 28, 2005 8:35 am
Posts: 4311
Angel_of_Caliban wrote:
Dobbsy wrote:
Quote:
id really love to see a one rules system / armies lists for all

Agreed. So a NetANZ only drives this further from possibility correct?

That what it sounds like to me. I didn't think the French system was all that used or good? But I prefer one worldwide system. I mean if ever made it to England to play Epic it would be for MoK Winter Warmer or something similar. The idea of countries having there own rule sets/army lists seems pointless, silly and slightly arrogant. The Main GW games aren't like that or even the other SG games.

As for ERC replacements....E&C or Simulated Knave sounds like fine choices. Also think that ERC members shouldn't be Core Lists AC's. I mean subs for variants lists awesome but I think balance and time issue makes it a better idea to have Race AC's and ERC members to be different folks.

Also I agree we should give till late June before we start demanding results. Ending semesters and graduations really fill the next few weeks and I understand the need for some patience but I would like to see the Army Book up no later than July 1st.

EpicFR is widely used in France, they have their own forums etc and a large community. I could say more in response to 'pointless, silly and slightly arrogant' but I'll leave it

_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk
NetEA NetERC Human Lists Chair
NetEA Chaos + Black Legion Champion


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 142 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 10  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net