Whoops. Yes it does. Edited.

However, I've also tried to make the wording on the special rule watertight, in that it only allows the TK attack to be fired when the Barrage is. In other words, no rules lawyering to allow a barrage one turn, then the TK the next! Can anyone with a legal bent of mind find a way around the wording?

_________________
SG

Ghost's Paint Blog, where everything goes that isn't something else.

Have an explanatory note, ala how land speeders have an explanatory note as to how their MW shooting works.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter

Like the one at the bottom there? But is that wording watertight enough?

_________________
SG

Ghost's Paint Blog, where everything goes that isn't something else.

Change to "must be applied to whatever unit is closest to the centre of the of the Barrage attack".

Note that this is effectively a special rule. I just thought you wanted the note to say that the TK attack and the Barrage had to be fired at the same time.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter

Without the special rule, the Barrage and TK attack do not have to land anywhere near each other: even with a 15 cm range they can be 20cm apart. I don't see a way around the special rule that accurately represents the weapon.

_________________
SG

Ghost's Paint Blog, where everything goes that isn't something else.

I am not sure that you can specify a different Special effect for the MW / TK attack. That is down to the srmour of the target.

However, I agree that it needs a unit / weapon note to the effect that they must target the same formation if you want to create this effect - and preferably that the Collossus hits under the centre of the template as you have specified. Seems Ok in principle to me.

Only issue here is how to place the bomb / template:-
Against a titan, the titan governs where the template goes, while against other targets, the template is key as it must be placed to cover as many units as possible - thus the bomb might actually miss altogether.

That's why I suggested the "core" of the bomb's attack should be applied to whatever unit is the closest to the centre of the template, rather than exactly at the centre.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter

What do you mean exactly by this GInger? Both attacks are/can be used, and each has a differant profile, similar to the Eldar Titan Power Fist. The only difference is that these attacks must be colocated and used together.

E&C: Generally, though not always, a WE under the hole will add enough attacks to a barrage to make it the most hits possible. Also, 'closest' can be contentious, but 'under' is not.

I think the note/special rule is fine as is, as long as there is no getting around the requirement to shoot them on the same turn.

_________________
SG

Ghost's Paint Blog, where everything goes that isn't something else.

I still think there's nothing wrong with BP3 TK(1) slow firing.

It doesn't need a special rule.

Where would you price that Zombo? 300? Higher?

Would it:

a) Be priced out of the range where the BP would be relevant?
b) Be representative of a weapon to be used against fortifications?

_________________
SG

Ghost's Paint Blog, where everything goes that isn't something else.

300 or maybe a bit less; people will CAP the crap out of it.

If you wanted to represent the weapon "correctly" it would need a crap load of special rules about destroying buildings etc. Abstract that out and you have a weapon that should be good against highly armoured targets.

Note that there is nothing in its fluff that says it's a WE hunter.

What are heavily armored targets if not War Engines?

_________________
SG

Ghost's Paint Blog, where everything goes that isn't something else.

Leman russ, Land Raiders...

You'd drop what amounts to a 10,000kg HEAT round on a Land Raider?

_________________
SG

Ghost's Paint Blog, where everything goes that isn't something else.

Nope, on a group of them.