I assume this is so you can judge lists for the NetEA Armies Book?

Blood Angels

List is stable, needs more testing, which I shall join in with just as soon as I have some nice Stormraven models. It's already recieving some playtesting, notably from Rug.

I have a list of minor modifications needed noted down somewhere, but it's certainly stable enough for the "In Development" tag.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter

Salamanders
List is nearly finished and pretty stable.
- Needs the updated stats for the Land Raider Redeemer
- Under discussion: Modification to the Predator Incinerator to switch the Autocannon for a Flamestorm Cannon.
- Under discussion: Increase Supreme Commander's cost from 75pts to 100pts.

Latest version canbe found in the first posting of this thread:
viewtopic.php?f=73&t=17374

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/

I feel pretty solid on Raven Guard. The structure seems to be ready and just needs testing to confirm point costs. It needs a little editorial work to clean up a couple typos and to clarify how planetfalling works in mixed formations.

So you mean you're looking for lists that people want to submit as being ready for the "Approved" tag?

I would not be confident putting forwards Blood Angels for the "Approved" tag at this stage.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter

"In Development" *means* "Almost finished", Hena: Playable and balanced with only, possibly, fine tuning needed.

"Experimental" means a list still needs a fair amount of work.

"Approved" means "Done".

Salamanders i devinitive "In Developement" and nearly "Done".

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/

Dark Angels - with normal termies and the other tweaks - nearly done just fine tuning left. Do an update bit like yours above in a bit.

I can't possibly say the Space Wolves is close to "nearly done" as not enough playtest/feedback has come in. That said, from the two games I've played with it so far and the minimal theory-feedback I've had on the forum I would say it's not bad but still needs more games.

The problem I see is that with no one else playing/reporting it apart from perhaps two people (myself included), I don't ever see it even becoming "Developmental." I just don't have enough time personally to get that many games in and, in the end, my opinion isn't enough to have an objective opinion anyway.

However, I'd love to see it listed in the NetEA Documents just for the sheer fact more people will see it and perhaps play/report it.

DA could be done if 4 or 5 people used them for a few games each. One games night in fact.