Quote:
Only a minor thing: I would label the Mantas
4 x Twin Manta Burst Cannons 15cm AA6+
to
Burst Cannon Array 15cm 4 x AA6+
As i find it odd that the Mantas Burst Cannons are twin-linked but are AA6+ instead of AA5+ as twin-linked would suggest.
E&C: Please comment.
Quote:
I've just noticed this, but what is the reasoning for twin Ion cannons on the Tigersharks? The stats are the same as an Ion Cannon, so they don't provide anything else correct? I know twin-linked is supposed to provide a +1 to hit but what does twin do?
I'll look at that.
Quote:
Also the Railgun stats on the ref sheet are still out of alignment for the main guns on each turret type.
Grrr, I thought I had that lined up. I'll look at it again.
Quote:
A few points:
- Why have the Manta Burst Cannons lost their AP5+ shot? (700pts for 5 shots ain't so good)
The aircraft borne burst cannon have been relegated to only an AA6+ value. It was part of the balancing act done when we did the aircraft evaluation earlier in the year. It's been that way for awhile.
Quote:
- Manta has Twin Linked Missile Pod. All other entries state Twin Missile Pod.
Consistency seems like such a simple thing to achieve. I'll fix it.
Quote:
- Are the Pathfinder Rail Rifles supposed to be 5+ (not sure on this - Hena said something)
That was my assumption and why they were changed.
Quote:
- The Barracuda fluff still talks about them using Interceptor Missiles.
Fluff? Who has time to read fluff?...Ok, I'll get to it.
Quote:
- The AX-1-0 entry still has Twin Missile Pod AT6+ (should be AP5+/AT6+)
Ok, I'll look at this. I'm assuming that you are referring to the descriptor box and not the reference sheet.
How is it that listing the same value in two different places increases your chance of error 5000%?
Thanx for catching these.
