Quote: (frogbear @ Oct. 26 2009, 11:26 )
Quote: (epilgrim @ Oct. 26 2009, 20:09 )
Aside from you question about the Leviathan's "hot-rod" profile your concerns over "serious flaws" seems to be overly attached to your perceptions of a non-historical gaming experience as a "real-world model" and in some cases overloooking the flexibility and adaptability of the ruleset. Actual flaws only show themselves in a play test of the list and as noted above sometimes these things are resolved by straining the mind a tad.
As always thanks for dropping in. ÂÂ
Wow, sarcastic much?
You have chosen to specifically not really answer the questions, but rather play with words and 'waste of time' examples.
How many playtests are we talking about and with what groups? If these are the responses that previous queries have recieved, no wonder people have stopped writing in.
If you cannot take the questions seriously, then good luck with your list. Sorry I gave a damn.
Sarcastic?...agreed.
"Playing with words", "wasting your time" and not specifically answering your questions?...I don't think you liked the answers or my choice of tone, however, I did address each of your questions and in six out of 7 I based each response on the rules or an existing profile.
By quickly dismissing my responses and changing the topic to a hyperbolic and pedantic response regarding playtest feedback and the treatment other people may have received you degrade the validity of your questions and your retort.
Hopefully you noted that I did give you credit for questioning the unusual speed of the Leviathan profile, yet you did nothing to question my somewhat flimsy answer to the design choice of the support weapons, nor did you choose to argue the rulebook answers I provided.
If you are that caught up in the rectitude of your own questions, so much so that you cannot engage in discussion, how can I consider if in fact you do (or did) give a damn?
PS Since your follow-up was in essence a separate thread question I suggest you search the various posts and find out for yourself what has transpired over the years since this list was introduced. I believe you will find there is quite a lot of discussion. Some was serious, some unkind; most of it constructive. There is even some evidence of playtesting.
Sadly, for a number of reasons, mostly related to GW Studio choices the Squats are primarily a footnote in the WH40K universe and only in Epic do they exist as a coherent playable concept. The Demiurg are one step removed as GW has declined to develop them at all. I have attempted to do so in the face of limited and amused interest as well as dismissive and rude accusations from devout self-appointed GW canon archivists. Even in context of a generally low level of interest the list as much as you may disapprove of some of the concepts is playable and has been so for many years.
If you choose to discuss this topic or your previous questions I will respond. If not, then enjoy those parts of Epic that suit your gaming.