Quote: (frogbear @ 26 May 2009, 04:03 )
Just a side note: I notice my suggestion is not included in the list of responses. Is it automatically dismissed?
Which one?
I like the ruling as in the first post:
- count 1 less BM for assault resolution (minimum of 1)
The minimum of one would definitely take away the problem where both forces have 1 blast marker yet the squats are getting +2 to combat resolution. That just sucked.
I also agree with the belief that the stubborn rule should not allow squats to hit easier in an assault. Does not make sense. Frankly, I do not think stubborn should effect assaults resolution in any way.
-or-
I just had an idea. Hows this for a suggestion..
Stubborn - in Assault resolution a stubborn unit counts as twice as many units (2 per base) when working out number within a unit.
Word it better than that, however it displays the stubborn resolve that each stand is actually theoretically worth 2 to show this.
It does not make them any better in combat, however gives the POTENTIAL to gain the +1 or maybe the +2 without adding all the character models and the like which come with their own advantages...
A bit like the ATSKNF rule but a lot less hardy and best thing - no rules change needed to the book or the Squat list. Then you could take this as a guide for other areas of the game where Stubborn rears its head.
