*Goes to check*


They're identical to Commissars, except their weapon is named 'Evicerator' and they've lost Fearless and gained Invulnerable Save.

So, a Stormhammer with an Invulnerable Save?

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter

They also cost +50 points in the Inquisition list, as an upgrade... so, I'd have no problem with that.

I think "Preachers/Priests" should be "Added to infantry only" actually.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?

Sure, it's still going to die when it takes 1DC damage and crits... like all Imperial Super-Heavy Tanks!  

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?

I like the stats for the Priests listed by Chroma. F#Fearless in Epic is not only the absence of fear but high diszipline. A bunch of soldiers aroused by the frenzied speech of a Priest doesn't seem very disciplined to me

@Hellhound: 3+ armousave? Have you seen this big promethium tank it has? One cratch and BOOM! there goes the tank. It should have a 5+ armour saver.
Another thing: Patterndescribes mainly an other weapons configuration and/or slight modification in a vehicles outlook.
But the Mossinion Hellhound looks like a totally different tank. It's as if you called the Ragnarok "Leman Russ Battletank (Ragnarok Pattern)".
So i would rename the Mossinian Hellhound, perhabs to Firedrake, Firesalamander, etc.

_________________
We are returned!
http://www.epic-wargaming.de/

Well, I've posted one...  

But that's not what I'm talking about, I mean *any* reporting on testing/playing be done with the list: armies it's faced, win/loss, point values it's been played at, etc.  Just the basic details of games the list has been involved in.

Has it faced an Ork Horde, or a Black Legion War Engine Army of Doom, or regular Imperial Guard... or even Necrons or Tyranids for some "extreme" testing?

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?

Why would 25 point upgrades "pop up every where!"?  They still take an upgrade slot, they still cost points; there's no reason to "have" to take them.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?

Are you saying that fearless Preachers have been the only thing allowing the Mossinians to compete?

That sounds like a big problem to me.

What armies have they squared off against?

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?

But that's not what I'm talking about, I mean *any* reporting on testing/playing be done with the list: armies it's faced, win/loss, point values it's been played at, etc.  Just the basic details of games the list has been involved in.

Has it faced an Ork Horde, or a Black Legion War Engine Army of Doom, or regular Imperial Guard... or even Necrons or Tyranids for some "extreme" testing?

_________________
author of Syncing Forward and other stories...

It's a dog-eat-dog world, and I've got my Milkbone underwear on.

Re Testing - is it 1.12 that needs testing or will there be a new iteration soon? Im a little confused but keen to help test if possible

_________________
They are free, yes, but not entirely free; for they have a master, and that master is Law.

1.13 will be out soon just as soon.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter

I think the core idea and now balance of the list is good; If the biggest problem we're up against is a fluff debate (Which can be resolved in several different ways, either be re-writing the rules or re-writing the fluff) then the list is almost settled.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter