(Vermis @ Mar. 16 2008,11:48)
QUOTE
Still, apart from falling within the sphere of influence of the AM, I don't see any difference between an AM Knight's planet, and any other in the galaxy. To keep them overly backwards is unneccessary cheese to my mind, falling into the trap of thinking anything to do with knights must be backwards.
Do you mean that any other planet in the galaxy is backwards too, or that knight worlds should be brought up to the social/technological level of other worlds?
If the latter, I'd put forward the argument that there isn't a concrete standard for an imperial world. ?I remember the couple of pages from the 3rd ed 40K book, detailing planetary types from advanced (so to speak) forge worlds and hive worlds, down to feudal/medieval worlds, feral worlds and death worlds. ?With those last two in mind, knight worlds aren't so badly off!
I'm not saying that knights or knight worlds should be exclusively medieval (the forge-working suit idea appealed to me); but if the majority of them are, or will be, I don't think it's an excercise in keeping them down, or that it's necessarily backward.
There could be some kind of He-Man/Eternia vibe to them.

EDIT: then you edited your post so my argument's fairly redundant.

?Anyway...
If you read up about these chaps are a real rip-off by priestly a co. (Mixed in with a bit of starship-troopers and the like too)