Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

FW Marine aircraft comparison

 Post subject: FW Marine aircraft comparison
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 3:56 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 7:52 am
Posts: 10348
Location: Malta
Ulp! The SG Thunderhawk IS small. ANd the LC should carry several times the amount of the Thunderhawk...
What a scaley mess, as the Tyranid said to the Slann....

I still like the 'old tinies' anyway.

_________________
Back from oblivion (again)?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: FW Marine aircraft comparison
PostPosted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:28 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 20, 2006 1:50 pm
Posts: 482
Location: Greater Los Angeles Area, CA
Based off the minis I would almost argue that the LC should be a lighter/less armed/armored lander, but it is a nice strong point when landed.  The minis are great, but now I am torn on whether I want to get 3 Thawks for my Epic Ultramarines.  I am probably going to get a few Thawks (both variants) for AI.

_________________
Airspace - AeroImp Forum


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: FW Marine aircraft comparison
PostPosted: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:27 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:35 pm
Posts: 653
Location: Houston, TX USA
As much as I like the larger scale thunderhawk, I think the SG version will always be my favorite.  Thanks for the comparison though I was wondering just how much larger they were.

Laters


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: FW Marine aircraft comparison
PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 12:15 am 
Me help Hena. Mommy says me smart.


Top
  
 
 Post subject: FW Marine aircraft comparison
PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 12:16 am 
Zooma zoom


Top
  
 
 Post subject: FW Marine aircraft comparison
PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:06 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 2:47 am
Posts: 3065
Location: Brisbane, Australia
So the LC is obviously the cleverer design...It can carry 6 Rhinos!

:)

_________________
Fire bad, tree pretty - Buffy


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: FW Marine aircraft comparison
PostPosted: Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:21 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 4:45 pm
Posts: 8139
Location: London
However it doesn't come with the ablative shielding that apparently protects it during the drop.

_________________
If using E-Bay use this link to support Tac Com!
'Abolish red trousers?! Never! Red trousers are France!' – Eugene Etienne, War Minister, 1913
"Gentlemen, we may not make history tomorrow, but we shall certainly change the geography."
General Plumer, 191x


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: FW Marine aircraft comparison
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 12:35 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:07 pm
Posts: 1015
The funny thing is only 1 of them is out of scale, the SG Thunderhawk. The LC actually carries 6 Epic Rhinos, so that's to scale and the Thunderhawk Transport carries 2 Epic Rhinos, again to scale.

_________________
Image
My Photobucket


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: FW Marine aircraft comparison
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 1:20 pm 
Has anybody proposed rules for a 'baby thunderhawk' (thunderchick?) to accurately reflect the smaller SG flier?


Top
  
 
 Post subject: FW Marine aircraft comparison
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 1:25 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 9:15 pm
Posts: 7948
Location: Denmark
Not that I know of... But if they do I'l love to se a set of rules for the even smaller Mk1 Thunerbrick! I mean: It is hardly the size of the cockpit of the FW T-hawl :D

_________________
Sofa General

Nobody expects the Inquisition!!!
http://theepiclounge.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: FW Marine aircraft comparison
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 5:19 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 5:07 pm
Posts: 1015

(Hena @ May 31 2007,13:27)
QUOTE

(mageboltrat @ May 31 2007,14:35)
QUOTE
The funny thing is only 1 of them is out of scale, the SG Thunderhawk. The LC actually carries 6 Epic Rhinos, so that's to scale and the Thunderhawk Transport carries 2 Epic Rhinos, again to scale.

Not really. How the heck does the Landing Craft store all 12 stands?

They sit in the rhinos?

_________________
Image
My Photobucket


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: FW Marine aircraft comparison
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 6:34 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 3:08 am
Posts: 761
However it doesn't come with the ablative shielding that apparently protects it during the drop.

and why would the T-hawk need shielding for reentry ? our primitive spaceships only need this because they enter the atmosphere at near orbital speeds, which they do because they haven't got the fuel to slow down.
o.k. sorry i know that nobody on this thread really cares about the real rocket science behind the thunderhawk, i just can't help myself. :)





_________________
"god help me, i do love it so" - Patton


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: FW Marine aircraft comparison
PostPosted: Thu May 31, 2007 8:33 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2004 6:21 pm
Posts: 1272
Location: UK/Suffolk
Just curious, from the diagram, does it mean you can assemble the T-Hawk Transporter without the Rhino/Land Raider?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 29 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 141 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net