Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Thunderhawk Transporters!!!

 Post subject: Thunderhawk Transporters!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 2:53 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 9:08 pm
Posts: 356
Location: Beavercreek, Ohio, USA
Oh my Emperor!  Oh my Emperor!  Oh my Emperor!  Oh my Emperor!  Oh my Emperor!  Oh my Emperor!  Oh my Emperor!  Oh my Emperor!  

All right, settle down Blarg, settle down.  What's the big deal?

[Squealing girl's voice] Forge World is going to do an Epic version of the Thunderhawk Transporter!!! [/Squealing girl's voice]

Blarg's newest "Can't Wait For It" desire

_________________
I shot a Deathstrike Missile and destroyed an enemy titan in my pajamas last night. ?How it got into my pajamas I still don't know...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Thunderhawk Transporters!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:21 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 1:06 pm
Posts: 348
Location: Reading, UK
It looks cool, but it's too big.  It makes titans look silly.

_________________
"The Hoff isn't just a person - he's a state of mind, a kind of higher power"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Thunderhawk Transporters!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:21 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 11:18 pm
Posts: 876
Location: Edinburgh, UK
Ooh, look at the prettyness...  :)

_________________
"Do not offend the Chair Leg of Truth; it is wise and terrible."
-Spider Jerusalem


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Thunderhawk Transporters!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 3:25 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire

(Bombot @ Sep. 26 2006,15:21)
QUOTE
It looks cool, but it's too big.  It makes titans look silly.

It's correctly in scale with the Epic range... It's supposed to carry two Rhinos underneath the hull after all!

The SG Thunderhawks are so small they're a joke... how they're supposed to fit 40 Marines (Or Dreadnoughts!) inside them I've no idea.

It's still smaller than a Marine Lander.



You can just about see the two Resin Rhinos under one in this shot: http://www.ageofstrife.com/albums/Spack93/IMG_1907.jpg





_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Thunderhawk Transporters!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:16 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA

(Evil and Chaos @ Sep. 26 2006,15:25)
QUOTE

(Bombot @ Sep. 26 2006,15:21)
QUOTE
It looks cool, but it's too big.  It makes titans look silly.

It's correctly in scale with the Epic range... It's supposed to carry two Rhinos underneath the hull after all!

Yes and no.

It might be an exact "scale down" of the 40K version but Epic models don't follow an exact scaling (and never have).  Larger models are scaled down at a higher ratio.  In particular, aircraft and titans are out of proportion, noticably smaller, than what they would be on a straight conversion.

_________________
Neal


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Thunderhawk Transporters!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:28 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 1:06 pm
Posts: 348
Location: Reading, UK

(Evil and Chaos @ Sep. 26 2006,15:25)
QUOTE
It's correctly in scale with the Epic range... It's supposed to carry two Rhinos underneath the hull after all!

I realise that, but because you look down on the games table, it kind of works to have the aircraft in a smaller scale.  It might be ok to have aircraft in the right scale but then there's no getting around the fact that the titans are completely out of scale with everything else.  I'd rather stick to a 'consistently' distorted scale.

_________________
"The Hoff isn't just a person - he's a state of mind, a kind of higher power"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Thunderhawk Transporters!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:43 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 8:45 pm
Posts: 11149
Location: Canton, CT, USA

(Bombot @ Sep. 26 2006,11:28)
QUOTE
I'd rather stick to a 'consistently' distorted scale.

Me too.

_________________
"I don't believe in destiny or the guiding hand of fate." N. Peart


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Thunderhawk Transporters!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:54 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 5:24 pm
Posts: 756
Location: The grim North... of England!
Or we could just get FW to make us some really big-ass Titans! :D
Seriously, though those Thunderhawks do look huge. Probably won't stop me buying some though...
Regards,
Reaver

_________________
Visit our websites:
Michael Lovejoy's Art
Grey Army


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Thunderhawk Transporters!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 4:59 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 9:15 pm
Posts: 7948
Location: Denmark
Bigger FW titans.... Now there's an idea... :;):

_________________
Sofa General

Nobody expects the Inquisition!!!
http://theepiclounge.wordpress.com/


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Thunderhawk Transporters!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 5:19 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
I prefer having the aircraft in-scale with the tanks and infantry.


There used to be a gradual scale upwards, but over the years everything is being brought to 6mm scale, first the tanks (Initially with SG scaling some of them up, then FW completing the range of true 6mm tanks), now the aircraft (FW only).

Only the titans remain at 1:500 scale instead of at 1:300 like the rest of Epic... and probably will do since having fullscale Titans would be (although awesome) highly expensive!

A Warlord at 6mm scale would stand the same height as a 40k scale Warhound! (11 inches tall!)


So yeah, Titans, probably not, but there's no reason why the rest of the range shouldn't be consistant (And better looking).



Edit:

I expect the sliding scale was only instituted due to early-gw production limits anyway.





_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Thunderhawk Transporters!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:00 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm
Posts: 36989
Location: Ohio - USA
See my comments on the G-Day post ... :D  As far as scale goes, since SM1, and F/W making Epic ... it's gone from 6mm to 8 ?!   But we  justify that by making them different Mk.s, Types, Versions, etc. ... F/W Valks & Vuls are twice the size of G/Ws !  So those are Type B's ... F/W's SH IG AFVs are bigger than G/W's !  Hence a different version !  G/W's Russes are bigger than F/W's ... another version !  It's a BIG Galaxy !  And History is full of this sort of thing.  Look at the AFVs in 1940 vs. those in '44 !   But that being said, it's just rationalization ... G/W & FW should be on the same OPLAN !   :D

_________________
Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Thunderhawk Transporters!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:02 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire

(Legion 4 @ Sep. 26 2006,18:00)
QUOTE
See my comments on the G-Day post ... :D  As far as scale goes, since SM1, and F/W making Epic ... it's gone from 6mm to 8 ?!   But we  justify that by making them different Mk.s, Types, Versions, etc. ... F/W Valks & Vuls are twice the size of G/Ws !  So those are Type B's ... F/W's SH IG AFVs are bigger than G/W's !  Hence a different version !  G/W's Russes are bigger than F/W's ... another version !  It's a BIG Galaxy !  And History is full of this sort of thing.  Look at the AFVs in 1940 vs. those in '44 !   But that being said, it's just rationalization ... G/W & FW should be on the same OPLAN !   :D

If they're another version of the aircraft, then those aircraft must be piloted by six year-old children. :)


The FW versions are correctly scaled... that's the size real aircraft tend to be!

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Thunderhawk Transporters!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:08 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 1:06 pm
Posts: 348
Location: Reading, UK

(Evil and Chaos @ Sep. 26 2006,18:02)
QUOTE
If they're another version of the aircraft, then those aircraft must be piloted by six year-old children. :)


The FW versions are correctly scaled... that's the size real aircraft tend to be!

It?s just that because aircraft are usually seen in the distance from below, we associate them with being smaller than they are.  On the table top, they are actually bigger to the eye than the ground units (being on flying stands).  Correct scale aircraft thus look kind of weird, even without the titan scale issue (which is the main one, imo).

If you?re doing a diorama, then you?re going to want the right scale aircraft.  But for games I think the messed up scale makes sense.

_________________
"The Hoff isn't just a person - he's a state of mind, a kind of higher power"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Thunderhawk Transporters!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:10 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 2:57 am
Posts: 20887
Location: Harrogate, Yorkshire
I don't get that feeling at all really (vis a vis perspective) ... SG aircraft just look dinky to me.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Thunderhawk Transporters!!!
PostPosted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 6:21 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 1:06 pm
Posts: 348
Location: Reading, UK
I do agree, but I guess I'd rather have the dinky aircraft than dinky titans.  Well, the titans are dinky anyway, but no need for a thunderhawk to come along and really embarass them!

_________________
"The Hoff isn't just a person - he's a state of mind, a kind of higher power"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net