I wouldn't count the Silver Towers or those in the other experimental lists against the Land Raider. But the stats of them compared to the OFFICIAL lists is too weak as well. The IG Baneblades are better then they are per-point-value, and Baneblades are generally considered under-powered for their price! The baneblades cost 100 more points and compare their stats:
4 Units, 4+ RA, TRA, 8x 45cm AT 4+, 4x 30cm AP 4+, 2 BP to suppress, 8BP to break
9 DC, 4+ RA, 3x 75cm 4+/4+, 3x 45cm 5+/6+, 3x 30cm 3+/4+ Ignore Cover, 3x 30cm AP 5+, 6x 45cm AT 5+. 3 BP to Suppress, 9 BP to break.
100 points gets you vastly superior fire-volume and comperably good fire-power. Longer range, tougher to kill, tougher to suppress, tougher to break formation which will beat Land Raiders senseless. The only good thing the LRs have is faster move-speed. Which is nice, but rarely enough to make up for their shortcomings in such an engagement! 6 LRs would be much more reasonable at 500 points:
6 Units, 4+ RA, TRA, 12x 45cm AT 4+, 6x 45cm AP 4+. 2 BP to suppress, 12 BP to break.
At that point I might be willing to consider them on-par with the Baneblade for their points-costs... Maybe. But even so most people consider the Baneblades to be horribly weak compared to the other choices available for 500 points (like the Shadowswords). Oh. And baneblades FF better and can't be trapped in melee as easily.
|