Steve54 wrote:
Even if as you say the BA are 10% down on the Codex SM, which I would dispute, that would still make them a very competitive list when you look at the results of the Codex list.
Depends how fine Epic's balance is in the first place... could be that air assault spam Marines are only an abstract 5% more effective than the average playing field at the moment, so an abstract 10% drop in power would then leave the list as 5% behind the average...
Are Marines really so far ahead of the power curve that an abstract 10% drop in power for the list still leaves it "very competitive"?
Would you therefore take 2700pts* of EUK Marines against 3000pts of EUK Orks with confidence that it was a balanced game?
(Presumably a *more* balanced game than it was before, if Codex Marines are so far ahead of the power curve that a 10% drop still leaves them "very competative"?)
That was a serious question, by the way, as if the objective answer is "yes", something should definitely be done about it, like a 10% rise in points (rounded to the nearest 25pts) for all of the most commonly-taken Marine formations.
=====
I do think that the EUK Blood Angels are indeed behind the power level of EUK's Codex Marine list**, as they have to take the (IMO) overpriced Death Company, they don't have Devastators, and their Assault formations don't fit neatly into Thunderhawks.
Are they behind or ahead of the power level of the average list in (Both EUK & NetEA) Epic however?
That's not a question I had actually considered.
=====
*A 10% drop in points from 3000pts.
**And as noted before, that is what EUK aimed for when developing the list, no?