Specific Marine List vs. IG |
|
Chris
|
Post subject: Specific Marine List vs. IG  Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 12:19 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 6:42 pm
Posts: 2412
|
|
Like the quote says, Tournament play says no Allies...
However, if you and your brother were having a fun game together, there is nothing stopping him having a combined SM and IG force. But if he would ever want to play in a tournament, he would have to either get some SM tanks or some IG infantry.
Hope this is of help!
Cheers
Chris
_________________
Chris
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Falesh
|
Post subject: Specific Marine List vs. IG Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 12:31 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 4:35 pm
Posts: 313
|
|
Thanks for the reply!
Out of interest do you know what it was that was being abused that made them take the rule out. Or more specifically what should me and my brother look out for to avoid making a SM/IG combo too powerful?
Falesh
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Chris
|
Post subject: Specific Marine List vs. IG Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 1:13 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
|
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 6:42 pm
Posts: 2412
|
|
I'm not entirely sure what caused the removal of the rule, but I would guess it would be that taking two balanced army lists, and combining them, meant that people could quite easily take the most powerful parts of both and make a "super-powerful" army list.
As for combinations you should look out for, the easist soultion is to just play and fins out for yourself! If say your brother took some SM infantry and a super heavy tank company, and it was too powerful, ban super heavy companies from use and limit them to support formations.
Again I hope this helps!
Cheers
Chris
Lastly, just out of curiosity, where on this little planet are you from?
_________________
Chris
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Legion 4
|
Post subject: Specific Marine List vs. IG Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 1:22 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm
Posts: 36984
Location: Ohio - USA
|
We have fought SMs & IG as allies all the time, since SM1 in '90. We just follow the rules for fighting with allies and choosing forces. We would never play Tournament Rules either. 
_________________
Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
iblisdrax
|
Post subject: Specific Marine List vs. IG Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 1:25 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2003 10:54 pm
Posts: 3381
Location: First star to the right, and straight on till morning.
|
|
The only problem I have with them banning this rule is that in the GW 40k fluff, the Guard and the SM are Supposed to be able to work together. The reason that they banned this combination is that they couldn't or wouldn't take the time to figure out a way to force players to field the combination correctly, ie not simply piecemeal, an artillery unit here, a tank unit there. That combination will result in a very powerfull force, the SM infantry and the IG armor and artillery. To just simply ban the use of them together is quite frankly, annoying.
my $.02
iblisdrax
_________________
"Have Leman Reuss, will travel"
"Hallo. My name is Indigo Montoya. You killed my father prepare to die!"
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
primarch
|
Post subject: Specific Marine List vs. IG Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 2:06 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 12:46 am
Posts: 27069
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma USA
|
|
Hi!
Allies in epic has been a long debated question. From a fluff point of view IG and SM are the same armies, forces of the Imperium after all. From a balance point of view I think they should be kept apart because it does lend itself to abuse. Thats what we did in net epic and its worked well.
Primarch
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Legion 4
|
Post subject: Specific Marine List vs. IG Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 2:31 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
|
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm
Posts: 36984
Location: Ohio - USA
|
In keeping with the SM1 rules, units are drawn as Companies or Battalions with supporting elements, so units could not be drawn piecemeal. You could have an SM Co. supporting an IG Bn or visa versa. Organizational Templates and Force Levels, plus a good set of rules for TO&Es makes it work without being "beardy" (to use a G/W term). That being said we didn't always choose allies and in many cases, fought a unit with all organic assets. However, SM1 Rules were designed with "allied" forces in mind ... As in the fluff ... 
_________________
Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Tas
|
Post subject: Specific Marine List vs. IG Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 4:30 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 10:01 am
Posts: 7823
Location: Sydney, NSW
|
|
I am a big fan of having Allied units and agree- it got banned because a loop-hole free rule couldnt be developed to stop "min-maxers".
I would suggest a percentage total allowed for allies (say 30%) and as L4 states, you must take full companies and any support dets must support the formnation they were bought with. IE an IG Support formation cant be attached to a SM Detachment.
If you want to restrict them a bit more and represent the (extremely realistic) problems of comms channels etc between two very different forces, do not allow them to dircetly support one another in firefights. This means you have to think carefully about how to employ your allies.
_________________
Tas
My General blog: http://tasmancave.blogspot.com/
My VSF Blog: http://pauljamesog.blogspot.com/
My ECW Blog: http://declaresir.blogspot.com/
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Falesh
|
Post subject: Specific Marine List vs. IG Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 4:55 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2003 4:35 pm
Posts: 313
|
|
Thanks for the help all, it's clarified a number of things. We're going to start with 30%, same dets/companies and see how it goes. If it's too powerful we'll tweak it for the next game.
Falesh
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Tas
|
Post subject: Specific Marine List vs. IG Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 5:23 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
|
Joined: Thu Mar 06, 2003 10:01 am
Posts: 7823
Location: Sydney, NSW
|
|
Sounds Good! Please let us know how it goes
Cheers
Tas
_________________
Tas
My General blog: http://tasmancave.blogspot.com/
My VSF Blog: http://pauljamesog.blogspot.com/
My ECW Blog: http://declaresir.blogspot.com/
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Legion 4
|
Post subject: Specific Marine List vs. IG Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 6:08 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
|
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm
Posts: 36984
Location: Ohio - USA
|
|
Yes, that's generally the way to do it. ?And as Tas, said the interoperability of units would be a factor. ?And you may have to think thru how you will use certain units. ?With activation, which is the hallmark of E:A, and a system we have always used, this should not be a problem.
_________________
Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
asaura
|
Post subject: Specific Marine List vs. IG Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 8:30 am |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2003 11:34 am
Posts: 481
|
|
[quote="Tas,02 2004 Jan.,03:30"][/quote]
I would suggest a percentage total allowed for allies (say 30%) and as L4 states, you must take full companies and any support dets must support the formnation they were bought with. ?IE an IG Support formation cant be attached to a SM Detachment.
|
Limiting company / support choices does not prevent min/maxing, which is why the "no allies" rule sounds good for tournaments. Cherrypicking is quite possible with that restriction in place. Consider a Steel Legion Artillery Company supported by Vultures and Deathstrikes supporting a Space Marine army. *shudder*
|
| Top |
|
|
|
primarch
|
Post subject: Specific Marine List vs. IG Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 2:14 pm |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
|
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 12:46 am
Posts: 27069
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma USA
|
|
Hi!
Net epic came up with a similar optional rule limiting allies to a 25% of the armies total.
Primarch
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Legion 4
|
Post subject: Specific Marine List vs. IG Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2004 3:50 pm |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
|
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm
Posts: 36984
Location: Ohio - USA
|
SM1 rules prevents "Cherrypicking", and as I said we started using activation since then. An SM Bn should be able to be fielded along side an IG Rgt. I've played 100s of games using SM1 Allies Rules and activation and know it works. The E:A TO&Es don't work for us and we won't use them. Tournament Rules I can see having no allies - it was even that way in SM1 1
_________________
Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
