Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 6 of 13
  [ 181 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 13  Next

AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army?
Legion 4
 Post subject: AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army?
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 3:59 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm
Posts: 36989
Location: Ohio - USA
We'll see ... but I ain't bet'n the farm on it ! :;):

_________________
Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
primarch
 Post subject: AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army?
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 4:03 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 12:46 am
Posts: 27069
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma USA
Hi!

Lets all chant...

FORGEWORLD, FORGEWORLD,FORGEWORLD,FORGEWORLD,FORGEWORLD,FORGEWORLD, FORGEWORLD,FORGEWORLD,FORGEWORLD,FORGEWORLD,FORGEWORLD, FORGEWORLD, FORGEWORLD,FORGEWORLD,FORGEWORLD,FORGEWORLD,FORGEWORLD,FORGEWORLD,
FORGEWORLD,FORGEWORLD,FORGEWORLD,FORGEWORLD,FORGEWORLD,FORGEWORLD,

I hope they heard that.... :;):

Primarch

_________________
Primarch


The Primarchload
Magnetized Titans Tutorial
Net Epic Gold
Heresy Rules
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
dafrca
 Post subject: AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army?
PostPosted: Sun Jun 12, 2005 4:41 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:02 pm
Posts: 10956
Location: Burbank, CA, USA
Or saw it. :;):

dafrca

_________________
"Every Man is a But Spark in the Darkness"
              - Cities of Death, page 59

Come fight me, if you dare...... http://dd-janks.mybrute.com
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Grimshawl
 Post subject: AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army?
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 3:40 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 7:11 pm
Posts: 208
Location: Newark Ohio
Just read thru this topic and unfortunately I have to agree, but one thing I dont understand is, GW has all of its own sales and history documented, why if they will only run with a game if it makes them Mad cash immediately do they even keep remaking Epic, their own records should show them about what they can expect, I mean I absolutely love this game, but if GW says to themselves, lets relaunch this game and if in the first 4months it doesnt make 15% of all our sales lets can it, cant they just look on their own past efforts and sales and go, this projection just doesnt work, ever,,,, You would think someone at GW would ether lower the barr or give up I mean why beat a dead horse.
I know that may have come acrrost as negative but I'm just saying for a company to invest all the resources into a game to revive it you would think they would either stay the course or at least have some idea of how sales should go, I mean if they made sales projections and Epic A far exceeded what they thought theyed sell, then even if the Game didnt make the 15% of the companies profits, you should be able to look at your own projections and say I Knew That was goona Happen. See what I mean?

_________________
who are we to bring down the stars
http://lostandfoundohio
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
nealhunt
 Post subject: AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army?
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:17 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
The role of Epic and the rest of SG is basically to provide a depth of experience.  They offer different interaction with the GW universe that can keep more experienced gamers involved.

I can say, for instance, that I have 2 40K armies primarily because I like Epic and the universe, but it's just so much easier to find a 40K game.

It's a similar concept to a "loss leader" in retail.

_________________
Neal
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Grimshawl
 Post subject: AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army?
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 4:56 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 7:11 pm
Posts: 208
Location: Newark Ohio
Nealhunt I see what your saying, but I am also involved in 40k and at least to me it seems like GWs policies dont match up with this view/policy, they tend not to take care of or try to retain their Veteran Gamers. Thats just my experiences and that of other people I know and talk to, but I think it is fairly acurate.
A seperate issue that bugs me is it seems like SGs are kept in a dark closet somewhere, or at least treated that way in America by GW, I mean not only are they not kept in the stores, but often they are not even advertised in stores. If you want your product to sell people need to be made aware of it, and I think GW  does a really poor job of this.

_________________
who are we to bring down the stars
http://lostandfoundohio
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Dwarf Supreme
 Post subject: AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army?
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:04 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 8:45 pm
Posts: 11149
Location: Canton, CT, USA
Grim, for 40k, keep in mind the target audience. GW doesn't want the veteran players, because they have already bought a ton of minis. GW wants the newbie teenagers who are starting from scratch in building armies.

As far as epic is concerned, I think GW's philosophy right now is to see how much profit it can make with as little investment as possible. Avoid the pitfall of applying logic to GW! ?:laugh: Also, I think GW views all SG games as ways of increasing 40k sales. There are few people like me who only play Epic and have never played 40k.




_________________
"I don't believe in destiny or the guiding hand of fate." N. Peart
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Grimshawl
 Post subject: AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army?
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:51 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 7:11 pm
Posts: 208
Location: Newark Ohio
your right to warn me about applying Logic to GW, thats good advice, my head was throbing.
call me dull but I never have understood how anyone targeting an audience or demographic can adequately explain also trying to exclude or drive off other customers. Not specificly cater to I can understand, but actively try to drive off is something altogether.

_________________
who are we to bring down the stars
http://lostandfoundohio
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
primarch
 Post subject: AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army?
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:04 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 12:46 am
Posts: 27069
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma USA
Quote (nealhunt @ 28 2005 June,11:17)
The role of Epic and the rest of SG is basically to provide a depth of experience. ?They offer different interaction with the GW universe that can keep more experienced gamers involved.

I can say, for instance, that I have 2 40K armies primarily because I like Epic and the universe, but it's just so much easier to find a 40K game.

It's a similar concept to a "loss leader" in retail.

Hi!

I agree with Neal. All non-core games are merely a portal to get people playing their more lucrative core games. Even if a game like epic doesnt make money on the level they desire, if it produces players who cross over to play core games it may be worth their while.

The more worthwhile question is ARE they getting such a crossover to make these ventures worthwhile?

I dont no the answer, but my gut tells me - NO.

Primarch

_________________
Primarch


The Primarchload
Magnetized Titans Tutorial
Net Epic Gold
Heresy Rules
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
primarch
 Post subject: AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army?
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:08 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 12:46 am
Posts: 27069
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma USA
Quote (Dwarf Supreme @ 28 2005 June,12:04)
Grim, for 40k, keep in mind the target audience. GW doesn't want the veteran players, because they have already bought a ton of minis. GW wants the newbie teenagers who are starting from scratch in building armies.

As far as epic is concerned, I think GW's philosophy right now is to see how much profit it can make with as little investment as possible. Avoid the pitfall of applying logic to GW! ?:laugh: Also, I think GW views all SG games as ways of increasing 40k sales. There are few people like me who only play Epic and have never played 40k.

Hi!

Correct!

SG = more players to port over to core games.

GW IS their core games. All is is just dressing to get people to play those.

Of course we could talk about WHY epic isnt a core game anymore.....

...but I gather you'll all heard the reasons more than enough time from me....  :;):

Primarch

_________________
Primarch


The Primarchload
Magnetized Titans Tutorial
Net Epic Gold
Heresy Rules
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
primarch
 Post subject: AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army?
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:13 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 12:46 am
Posts: 27069
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma USA
Quote (Grimshawl @ 28 2005 June,12:51)
your right to warn me about applying Logic to GW, thats good advice, my head was throbing.
call me dull but I never have understood how anyone targeting an audience or demographic can adequately explain also trying to exclude or drive off other customers. Not specificly cater to I can understand, but actively try to drive off is something altogether.

Hi!

Thats easy.

Younger audience usually means less attention span, thus they drop out of the hobby after a short, but furious shopping spree they leave for something else. The cycle commences again with another newbie.

Older gamers who stick around a long time have lots of stuff, buy less, warn newbies about GW "scams" and are generally resistant to change (be it justified or not).

This is so true that I have seen GW propaganda to US store owners that specifically warns store owners to "disuade" veterans from hanging around the store. I wish I would have kept a copy of that. It speaks volumes of GW's market strategy.

So for GW it IS profitable to alienate a segment of their consumer base. Only time will tell if in the long run it was a good strategy or not.

Primarch

_________________
Primarch


The Primarchload
Magnetized Titans Tutorial
Net Epic Gold
Heresy Rules
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Dwarf Supreme
 Post subject: AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army?
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:20 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 8:45 pm
Posts: 11149
Location: Canton, CT, USA
Quote (primarch @ 28 2005 June,21:08)
Of course we could talk about WHY epic isnt a core game anymore.....

...but I gather you'll all heard the reasons more than enough time from me.... ?:;):

Actually, I haven't heard why epic is no longer a core game. Please enlighten me.

_________________
"I don't believe in destiny or the guiding hand of fate." N. Peart
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
primarch
 Post subject: AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army?
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:31 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 12:46 am
Posts: 27069
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma USA
Hi!

hehe, I just LOVE to talk about that.... :;):

The short answer is Epic 40k, the third edition of epic.

Without going into the merits of the game (which would be a topic of much debate in it of itself... :;): ), from a pure sales perspective, to put it mildly, it flopped.

Six months from that games release, GW pretty much dropped support leaving players of such armies like chaos and tyranids without a reliable source of minis.

Within two years of its release, for the first time in its history epic became out of print.

Epic went from a core game to no game. It has NEVER recovered. Attempts have been made, but GW has never put into epic the backing second edition had or even third edition for that matter.

Now, excluding perceptions regarding the game itself, I would say its a fair assessment to say that it was "mostly" GW's fault the game tanked. They didnt read the market appropriately on how players would react to the changes (which included eliminating squats...) nor did they market and distribute the game effectively beyond the initial box set.

This is the "short" version. But I think I got what most people would agree on.

Of course if you wanted to get into game related reasons for its failure.... then it gets more "interesting"..... :;):

Primarch

_________________
Primarch


The Primarchload
Magnetized Titans Tutorial
Net Epic Gold
Heresy Rules
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Dwarf Supreme
 Post subject: AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army?
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:40 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 8:45 pm
Posts: 11149
Location: Canton, CT, USA
Quote (primarch @ 28 2005 June,21:31)
This is the "short" version. But I think I got what most people would agree on.

Of course if you wanted to get into game related reasons for its failure.... then it gets more "interesting"..... :;):

I know why I don't like Epic40k, but what are the "game related" reasons for its failure?

Primarch, if you want to PM me with the answer instead of posting here in the forum, feel free.

_________________
"I don't believe in destiny or the guiding hand of fate." N. Peart
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
primarch
 Post subject: AMTL: Has anyone tried the Titan Army?
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 9:55 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 12:46 am
Posts: 27069
Location: Edmond, Oklahoma USA
Hi!

Quite alright, the reasons are not secret... :;):

In the simplest form, the game seemed not to please a lot of the old epic players becuase they changed "too much". That of course is subjective, some DID like the changes. For those who didnt the most often quoted things are:

1. Flavorless - they found that the elimination of all the loveable (and extremely wacky) special rules made units bland and uninspiring. Orks didnt have those wierd rules where equipment performed spectacularly or blew up in your face. Chaos had no individual unique powers. Insipid.

2. Too streamlined - while abstraction may be a good thing most of the time, it was felt by quite a few that abstracting armor, saving throws, weapon types went to far. One could debate endlessly what this scale should represent, but those who didnt like it, like me, didnt like that level of abstraction

3. Blast markers - cool concept, lousy implementation. Many specially didnt like that you could suppress weapons on titans thus rendering them useless this way. Too easy to incapacitate formations via blast markers. Realistic? Maybe. But not fun in the view of some.

Those of what I remember of the top of my head. Back in the days of the great version flame wars I could fill pages with minute nit-picky details of why I thought it stunk. No point in beating that dead horse anymore though.

In the end why it "failed" had more to do with player perception than with any tangible reality of the game itself. It failed becuase more people thought it wasnt an improvement over the previous system than those who thought it was. Add GW's atrocious marketing to it and you get an enormous flop.

Primarch

_________________
Primarch


The Primarchload
Magnetized Titans Tutorial
Net Epic Gold
Heresy Rules
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 6 of 13
  [ 181 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ... 13  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net