The Best and Worst of Epic |
Mojarn Piett
|
Post subject: The Best and Worst of Epic Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2004 3:23 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 7:35 am Posts: 5455 Location: Finland
|
Quote (dafrca @ 25 2004 Nov.,13:32) | There was nothing in They will be discribed in the unit text and in the final names of the support formation.
dafrca | Excellent! Now how about the PSI and Custodian titans...? 
_________________ I don't know and I let who care. -J.S.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
stormseer
|
Post subject: The Best and Worst of Epic Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2004 3:57 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 9:52 pm Posts: 4598 Location: Suffolk, UK.
|
A 'booster pack' of new weapons for Imperial titans, like the Inquisitor packs would be quality, and I'm sure it would sell very well!
Even if you just provided a limited number of options, I feel it would be a lot better than fixed variants....
btw... are the Mk2 Warlord weapons useable with the Mk3 weapon mounts?
_________________ www.darkrealmminiatures.com
|
|
Top |
|
 |
dafrca
|
Post subject: The Best and Worst of Epic Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2004 5:17 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:02 pm Posts: 10956 Location: Burbank, CA, USA
|
Quote (stormseer @ 25 2004 Nov.,06:57) | A 'booster pack' of new weapons for Imperial titans, like the Inquisitor packs would be quality, and I'm sure it would sell very well!
Even if you just provided a limited number of options, I feel it would be a lot better than fixed variants....
btw... are the Mk2 Warlord weapons useable with the Mk3 weapon mounts? | Sadly, no. They are different. That is one of the things on my mind. It is not as simple as just offering a single "Weapons Pack". As I said, each Titan has different ways the weapons are mounted and different scale issues.
I do agree though that some veriations are needed to bring the list the correct "Titan Focus" feel.
dafrca
_________________ "Every Man is a But Spark in the Darkness" - Cities of Death, page 59
Come fight me, if you dare...... http://dd-janks.mybrute.com
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Justiniel
|
Post subject: The Best and Worst of Epic Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2004 5:22 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 8:59 am Posts: 3280 Location: Holywood, Northern Ireland
|
That's a great pity, no variations Is it possible to have a sort of addendum though allowing variations for those lucky enough to own the old Beetle, and or for those who convert?
_________________ I'm involved in Nunnery Practice  My latest Blog http://www.players.tacticalwargames.net ... p?blogId=8
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Mojarn Piett
|
Post subject: The Best and Worst of Epic Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2004 9:08 am |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 7:35 am Posts: 5455 Location: Finland
|
Since I am at it, here are some suggestions for the custodian titan:
-There can only be one per army as each legion only has one. -The titan is equipped with a custodian head and a devotional bell. -The head gives the titan some sort of psychic attack (the head has a personality imprint of a psyker). -The bell has adverse effects on summoned daemons on certain radius (TBD) and each imperial unit with units in the radius may remove one extra blast marker. The bell takes the place of both carapace hardpoints (i.e. the turbolasers in the standard warlord). -The psychic attack of the head should be some low barrage point attack which ignores cover.
_________________ I don't know and I let who care. -J.S.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
dafrca
|
Post subject: The Best and Worst of Epic Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2004 8:14 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 6:02 pm Posts: 10956 Location: Burbank, CA, USA
|
Quote (Justiniel @ 25 2004 Nov.,08:22) | That's a great pity, no variations  | Don't take my comments wrong. I am working to keep at least some veriations in the list. I just was pointing out the issues that need to be covered when we start to talk about expanding the Titan lists.
dafrca
_________________ "Every Man is a But Spark in the Darkness" - Cities of Death, page 59
Come fight me, if you dare...... http://dd-janks.mybrute.com
|
|
Top |
|
 |
wargame_insomniac
|
Post subject: The Best and Worst of Epic Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:22 pm |
|
Purestrain |
 |
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 6:42 pm Posts: 3305 Location: West Yorkshire, UK
|
Quote (dafrca @ 25 2004 Nov.,13:51) | First is balance, the more open the system the more likely we fail to see some broken combo. No I would hope that would come out in playtest, but the CCG market has proven that the larger the number of options (cards) the more likely playtest fails to catch a broken combo.
The second is production logistics. Many of those asking for an open ended system keep talking about the plastic "Beadle Back" WarLord. Jervis has already said that the Plastics will not come back. In fact, it was somewhat a shock to have even the plastic Marine and IG sprues at all. New Troops have all been metal. So I do not expect to see the old plastic Warlord show up.
This leaves us with the ?New? Warhound, Old Reaver, New Warlord, and the FW Versions. Four weapon mounting systems. For the sake of argument let?s say we restrict the Warhound to the four weapons now made by FW. This leaves us with the Warlord and Reaver. The Reaver can use the old metal weapons so if GW put them back into production we could have some variety there, but the Warlord? The New Warlord has shoulder mounted weapons that would not trade out easy at all and the arm mounted weapons are enough larger then the rest that the Reaver weapons would look odd. So do we make two versions of every weapon? Or three versions so the shoulder ones could be traded out too? |
Having played Mechwarrior, Heroclix and Mageknight, and with friends into Magic and LOTR CMG, I can vouch for the more options resulting in more broken combos.
I have always been ardently in favour of pre set weapon configurations. If we can get SG to release 2/3 new versions of the Warlord and FW to release 1/2 new versions of the Reaver then I'll be happy, nay ecstatic! Cheers
James
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Warmaster Nice
|
Post subject: The Best and Worst of Epic Posted: Sat Nov 27, 2004 12:08 am |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 9:15 pm Posts: 7948 Location: Denmark
|
...And let's not forget that these fixed combos are purely for tournament play. In friendly games you can do whatever you and your opponent agrees upon. Personally I like the idea of fixed basic combos with the option to switch a weapon for more variation.
Cheers! 
_________________ Sofa General
Nobody expects the Inquisition!!! http://theepiclounge.wordpress.com/
|
|
Top |
|
 |