| Author |
Message |
Forum: NetEA Chaos Topic: Death Guard v2.1 |
| I*am*Salvation |
|
Posted: Tue Jan 19, 2010 4:33 pm
|
|
Replies: 64
Views: 8590
|
The Deathguard Player i know has several Options 
1. Different Colours on Shoulderpads
2. Different Base Sizes (Old & New Bases)
3. Different Basing Material
4. Painted&Unpainted Mixed ^^ |
|
 |
Forum: Epic Armageddon Topic: Would you like a copy of Epic: Siege? |
| I*am*Salvation |
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 1:55 pm
|
|
Replies: 69
Views: 12492
|
They only don´t know they are chaotic...  |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Chaos Topic: Harbinger? |
| I*am*Salvation |
|
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 2:07 pm
|
|
Replies: 9
Views: 1851
|
then add the Big Bomb ^^
one shot, 3BP, MW2+ TK1 or something like that.  |
|
|
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: Bombard Artillery |
| I*am*Salvation |
|
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 2:04 pm
|
|
Replies: 39
Views: 8089
|
I don´t think this is needed... It´s ok like it is now, and i don´t care about 40k rules.
I teach Epic to a lot of 40k players an noone ever complaint about a unit that has diffrent stats.
They all just accept that this is a diffrent game. |
|
|
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: Wraith Gates and blocking |
| I*am*Salvation |
|
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 1:50 pm
|
|
Replies: 21
Views: 3500
|
| imho the only order that is alowed in this case is to engage the surounding forces. But only as long as there is enough space to place the formation you want to assault with. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Chaos Topic: Harbinger? |
| I*am*Salvation |
|
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 2:40 pm
|
|
Replies: 9
Views: 1851
|
imho 6BPs are not enough... it´s a Monster of a Bomber, it can levle whole citys... it should be more powerfull imho just look at its stats in AI its by far more powerfull in bombing than any other aircraft!
(26 "normal" Bombs +1 Giant Bombs or 13 additional normal Bombs) |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Chaos Topic: Death Guard v2.1 |
| I*am*Salvation |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 26, 2009 11:11 pm
|
|
Replies: 64
Views: 8590
|
Woot, i missed this Update!
My Mate playing DG will be happy to use Dreadclaws and all that stuff...
Think i will be able to post a BatRep soon! (vs. Bieltan) |
|
|
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: [NetEA] Army Compendium - DRAFT - Craftworld Eldar |
| I*am*Salvation |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:47 pm
|
|
Replies: 147
Views: 31596
|
| Quote: (Ginger @ Nov. 05 2009, 13:02 ) Quote: (I*am*Salvation @ Nov. 05 2009, 11:53 ) I used the Swords of Vaul too and never had Problems with it... i rarely take Fireprisms in it as i don´t like to have mixed Units with diffrent Ranges. (60cm vs. 45cm) The old FP Formation was realy o... |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Eldar Topic: Problems with Craftworld Eldar list |
| I*am*Salvation |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:58 pm
|
|
Replies: 197
Views: 23723
|
| In Fact it should be cheaper than a Serpent as it´s not as good as a Tronsport for Assault Troops. The only Aspect that can make use of Falcons are Dark Reapers. In Biel Tan it´s realy much to expansive to get a Formation like this on the table. I think "Transport" Falcons should be 40 Pts. fo... |
|
|
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: [NetEA] Army Compendium - DRAFT - Craftworld Eldar |
| I*am*Salvation |
|
Posted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:53 pm
|
|
Replies: 147
Views: 31596
|
| I used the Swords of Vaul too and never had Problems with it... i rarely take Fireprisms in it as i don´t like to have mixed Units with diffrent Ranges. (60cm vs. 45cm) The old FP Formation was realy overpriced, i allways toke the Falcons when i playd it like that. Now i use some FirePrisms again... |
|
|
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: [NetEA] Army Compendium - DRAFT - Craftworld Eldar |
| I*am*Salvation |
|
Posted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:35 am
|
|
Replies: 147
Views: 31596
|
| hm.. the longer i think about it, the stranger it gets that Eldar are perhaps the Army with the worst initiativ to activate. Ok, Orks got 3+ but they get +2 if they use their "fav orders" like engage, double and get bonus to ralley if there are enough left. Tyranids also get +2 on all important orde... |
|
|
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: [NetEA] Army Compendium - DRAFT - Craftworld Eldar |
| I*am*Salvation |
|
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:52 pm
|
|
Replies: 147
Views: 31596
|
| Just my 2 Cents: - Pulse is ok like it is now - Revenants need to drop in points or go back to 3+ - Some replacement for the Spiritstones would realy be very helpfull I hate it if i want to start a cool manoeuver and fail the 2nd activation, often exposing the first formation i moved in for support ... |
|
|
Forum: Wargames Trades Topic: [Casting] Chroma's Defensive Structures |
| I*am*Salvation |
|
Posted: Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:37 pm
|
|
Replies: 83
Views: 9231
|
My pieces arived yesterday, they a realy very good looking and well cast!
Also thx for the extra pieces you included!  |
|
|
Forum: EpiComms NetEA Rules Amendments Topic: [NetEA] Army Compendium - DRAFT - Craftworld Eldar |
| I*am*Salvation |
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 12:37 pm
|
|
Replies: 147
Views: 31596
|
Noticed it yesterday...
Quote:
2 x Revenant Pulse Laser
45cm
2x MW4+
Why again 4+?
In the old NetEA Statlist i used it was 3+ like in Swordwind.
8xMW 4+ realy sucks for this bunch of points imho. |
|
|
Forum: NetEA Adeptus Mechanicus Topic: AMTL 3.16 |
| I*am*Salvation |
|
Posted: Wed Oct 21, 2009 9:32 am
|
|
Replies: 111
Views: 25926
|
| We are talking about balance for Tournaments, right? It´s just ok to let this list have better chances against some list and lower it chances against other Lists imho. A Titan Legion will allways have hard Days against Popcorning/High TK Amount Armies, while crushing Armies that don´t wield an... |
|
|
| Sort by: |