LordotMilk wrote:
Thanks man. If I want to play with my own rules, I can use them. Thanks.
However if I want to play with the Net EA rules and I happen to disagree with a change, I must either change my opinion, or stop using NetEA rules? How about just disagreeing with a change? Can that not just be ok?
Concerning the EUK lists, thats fine, but again, if I wanted to use other rules, I would.
All I am trying to say is that, in my opinion backed up my by my experience in my games, the option chosen for the Decimator in the latest changes is not as good as some of the other options out there that could have remedied the obvious problem that you also have underlined: Decimators are too good a choice for 225 points.
no need to take that tone, I've been nothing but polite with you and that was uncalled for
You're welcome to your opinion, but the simple point is that you are not backing any of your assertions up with any kind of data..... play some batreps, SHOW how the decimator is overpowered..... PROVE your point, and if the good people here can provide explanations to help you deal with them if your local meta plays in a certain way, if that is the case, then man up, accept that you don't know everything and figure out how to beat them (not making any assumptions here of course)
I bring up the EUK list as it's the
same freaking list Steve is one of the main co-ordinators for EUK and is very keen on synergising the two, ergo as it's been out in the EUK scene for a while, it's recieved plenty of playtesting, I assumed you knew this, and apologise if you weren't aware
Decimators are nasty, in smaller numbers or not backed up with other war engines they're not overpowered, and I see good players beat lists with them often, they require a different form of balance than simple points tweaks.... I'm sorry that you don't like the changes and I guess we can agree to disagree as you say....