Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Results from the NDC Step 3 vote regarding Imperial Gu lists

 Post subject: Re: Results from the NDC Step 3 vote regarding Imperial Gu l
PostPosted: Sat Oct 05, 2019 8:43 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 6:18 pm
Posts: 300
Largo_W wrote:
I am asking about the changes you put forward, DKOK Warhound and Baran


I need to check because it’s been a while, but from memory Baran and DKoK tweaks (the NDC ones) are also with ERC.... I should have a good opportunity to catch up with what’s going on next weekend.

If you’re looking for some sort of answer or definitive update immediately you’re going to be disappointed, give me a fortnight and a couple of PMs to keep me on task and we should get somewhere.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Results from the NDC Step 3 vote regarding Imperial Gu l
PostPosted: Sat Oct 05, 2019 10:29 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:25 pm
Posts: 9476
Location: Worcester, MA
This is all we got for DKoK and BSM:

Quote:
DKoK:
DKoK: Remove single warhounds from list.

Siege Masters:
Make Flak battery 150 points from current 100 points.
Bunkers become difficult terrain for WE:s with clarification that WE:s can't barge units out of bunkers.
Add no barging rule to trenches (se suggestion for bunkers).


Steve posted that on 2018-09-16, they were voted on, approved and in the TP the next day.

_________________
Dave

Blog

NetEA Tournament Pack Website

Squats 2019-10-17


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Results from the NDC Step 3 vote regarding Imperial Gu l
PostPosted: Sun Oct 06, 2019 12:12 am 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 6:18 pm
Posts: 300
Dave wrote:
This is all we got for DKoK and BSM:

Quote:
DKoK:
DKoK: Remove single warhounds from list.

Siege Masters:
Make Flak battery 150 points from current 100 points.
Bunkers become difficult terrain for WE:s with clarification that WE:s can't barge units out of bunkers.
Add no barging rule to trenches (se suggestion for bunkers).


Steve posted that on 2018-09-16, they were voted on, approved and in the TP the next day.


Yep, they’re the ones. Thanks Dave.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Results from the NDC Step 3 vote regarding Imperial Gu l
PostPosted: Sun Oct 06, 2019 7:16 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 6:55 pm
Posts: 803
Great, thanks for the update! Was a bit in muddy waters here as no update came through "here" :)

Looking forward to your update after the tourney!

_________________
My blog - A man without a mountain of unpainted lead is no real man!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Results from the NDC Step 3 vote regarding Imperial Gu l
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 1:27 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 22, 2015 5:43 pm
Posts: 274
Location: Germany/UK
Did the fire support for DKoK get adjusted also?

Latest PDF stafes 4 stands, Army builder states 6


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Results from the NDC Step 3 vote regarding Imperial Gu l
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 1:49 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:25 pm
Posts: 9476
Location: Worcester, MA
As far as I'm aware the TP is correct.

_________________
Dave

Blog

NetEA Tournament Pack Website

Squats 2019-10-17


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Results from the NDC Step 3 vote regarding Imperial Gu l
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 2:05 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2020 8:46 am
Posts: 67
Dave wrote:
As far as I'm aware the TP is correct.

so 4 bases is it... right? when did this change... as it was not listed in the changelog? (or i am just to blind to spot it somewhere)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Results from the NDC Step 3 vote regarding Imperial Gu l
PostPosted: Mon May 04, 2020 2:27 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:24 pm
Posts: 9624
Location: Manalapan, FL
Not certain if that's actually a change. Checked the original published list from Epic: Siege and it was 4 units back then as well. Doesn't mean that it wasn't bumped to 6 at some point. Could have been a simple transcription error when put into army builder. OTOH Matt Shadowlord kinda had a habit of making "official" changes that never got actually approved. Could have been one of those. Might be worth digging through his posts?

edit:

pertinent posts I found on that topic in this section
https://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd ... 03#p631503
https://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd ... 19#p578919

From my digging it appears this 4-6 happened as part of Matt dreaming it up in this timeframe. Can't see anything discussing a it ever being put to a vote and actually approved.
https://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd ... 74&t=30347

Matt collates here what was approved from that pdf above
https://www.tacticalwargames.net/taccmd ... 68#p606068


Attachments:
Capture.PNG
Capture.PNG [ 65.1 KiB | Viewed 2628 times ]

_________________
He's a lawyer and a super-villian. That's like having a shark with a bazooka!

-I HAVE NO POINT
-Penal Legion-Fan list
-Help me make Whitescars not suck!
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net