Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

Harlequin(4.2)V'sCodex Astartes (NetEA2014)

 Post subject: Harlequin(4.2)V'sCodex Astartes (NetEA2014)
PostPosted: Sat Oct 08, 2016 10:01 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 1:42 pm
Posts: 693
Location: Bundaberg, QLD, Australia
Hi All,

Well we manage another game of epic. It was 3000 point per side and it was between Harlequin(4.2) and Codex Astartes (NetEA Tournament Pack 2014)..

I played the Harlequin(4.2) and Trent played the Codex Astartes (NetEA Tournament Pack 2014)

Link to Harlequin(4.2)…
viewtopic.php?f=24&t=31579

Link to AAR..
http://pfe100.blogspot.com.au/2016/10/h ... netea.html

_________________
Regards
Greg

*************************************************

Not against change, so long as it done fairly and no one is left behind....

I'm human and not a !@#$%^# Robot..


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harlequin(4.2)V'sCodex Astartes (NetEA2014)
PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2016 11:09 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:20 pm
Posts: 5483
Location: London, UK
Interesting game as you say. Some observations:-
  • I was intrigued at the inclusion of Wave Serpents; using 5x Venoms is 25pts cheaper (and allows the Harlies to fight mounted in the rare cases where that is beneficial). The extra points can provide other leaders like the Shadowseer . . . .
  • The infantry have Infiltrate which is almost as good as being mounted, and the leaders can command joint attacks on larger targets where necessary. Unmounted, they can also make better use of cover.
  • In particular, the second attack with the Mimes left two units out where they could have moved into contact which might well have had a different result. As it was they did nothing.
  • Cegorach needs carefull placing (as you found out). You need to put him where you expect at least one formation to be able to survive the enemy counter-attacks.
    It is also easy to overlook the way he influences the initiative on both sides.
  • I am also interested in the choice of opponent formations - presumably the Marine list was designed both to give the Harlies a chance, to see how they worked in assaults, and to avoid over-exploiting the various weaknesses (lack of AA, lack of air-power, lack of shooting etc)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harlequin(4.2)V'sCodex Astartes (NetEA2014)
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 12:57 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 1:42 pm
Posts: 693
Location: Bundaberg, QLD, Australia
Thanks for reading…

* I know, that the Venoms cheaper and has advantages, but testing still needs to be done on the other vehicles. So it may mean a few games were there are falcons and Wave Serpents in numbers and no Venoms for a while….

* Opps don’t play a game with eyes hanging out of head, after trying to get over a tummy bug, my apologies. So now you have game showing them not using Infiltrate and I would say the game may have had a different result, since I would have had more targets to choose…

*Cegorach was interesting and I must say fun to use and I can see it been a real pain to lower intiv armies, but yeah I knew I was in trouble, once I had lost both Mimes..

*The Marine list was designed by Britt and is one of his standard armies in a box, as I call them.

_________________
Regards
Greg

*************************************************

Not against change, so long as it done fairly and no one is left behind....

I'm human and not a !@#$%^# Robot..


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harlequin(4.2)V'sCodex Astartes (NetEA2014)
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 11:14 am 
Hybrid
Hybrid

Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2005 1:32 pm
Posts: 4893
Location: North Yorkshire
Thanks for the report. Did you feel that you needed to commit the Mimes early?

_________________
_________________
www.epic-uk.co.uk - home of the UK Epic tournament scene
NetEA NetERC Xenos Lists Chair
NetEA Ork + Feral Ork + Speed Freak Champion


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harlequin(4.2)V'sCodex Astartes (NetEA2014)
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 12:18 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 1:42 pm
Posts: 693
Location: Bundaberg, QLD, Australia
Tiny-Tim wrote:
Thanks for the report. Did you feel that you needed to commit the Mimes early?


Thanks for reading...

In hind site, I should have left them to turn 2 or 3..But I was trying to throw the flank into disarray and put my opponent on the back foot, before he moved, but he won SR roll.. :)

_________________
Regards
Greg

*************************************************

Not against change, so long as it done fairly and no one is left behind....

I'm human and not a !@#$%^# Robot..


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harlequin(4.2)V'sCodex Astartes (NetEA2014)
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 1:23 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:20 pm
Posts: 5483
Location: London, UK
In that sense, the teleporting Mimes are similar to Tyranid Lictors; fearsome if you win the strategy roll, but easily defeated if the enemy goes first. Here, there was a 50-50 chance of failing, which some might consider to high.
However, they become much more sinister where there is 1-2 difference in the SR, and really lethal against armies with a SR of 1-2 . . . .


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harlequin(4.2)V'sCodex Astartes (NetEA2014)
PostPosted: Mon Oct 10, 2016 3:05 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 1:42 pm
Posts: 693
Location: Bundaberg, QLD, Australia
So true...

Thursday coming should see a rematch.. :)

_________________
Regards
Greg

*************************************************

Not against change, so long as it done fairly and no one is left behind....

I'm human and not a !@#$%^# Robot..


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harlequin(4.2)V'sCodex Astartes (NetEA2014)
PostPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2016 8:02 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Wed May 02, 2012 11:51 am
Posts: 278
Thanks for the battle report - intresting reading.

By the sound of things The Laughing God marker and vulnerable assault units makes this list much stronger against low SR and 2+ Intiative armies. Space Marines offer a challenge so a good list for playtesting.

Will read the rematch with intrest.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: Harlequin(4.2)V'sCodex Astartes (NetEA2014)
PostPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2016 12:29 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 1:42 pm
Posts: 693
Location: Bundaberg, QLD, Australia
Thanks for reading..Yeah today rematch is ago..change to the SM list..he taking Destructors instead of the Annihilators.Which make it..well more interesting..

_________________
Regards
Greg

*************************************************

Not against change, so long as it done fairly and no one is left behind....

I'm human and not a !@#$%^# Robot..


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net