Hi,

1 question and 2 erratas:

Q1) question: about Eldar titan Power Fist, should it now act as the new Imperial Power fist (can re-roll one or all close combat dice(s)) ?

E1) errata: Biel Tan Phoenix Host page 8, box at right:
"These stands take on the exact same characteristics as the Aspect Warriors, with the addition of the Command and HQ abilities."
should be replaced by:
"These stands take on the exact same characteristics as the Aspect Warriors, with the addition of the Command, HQ abilities and a +8 caf value".

E2) errata: stats table page 55, phantom titan: move is noted "25cm", should be "20cm"

E2: Why is that an error? I've been using 25cm as the Move value for Phantom Titans through all iterations of the formula to date.

Mind, I'm not saying that it cannot be an error, just wondering why you are saying that it is.

Phantom Titan description table have always set the movement at 20cm in all NetEpic versions since 4.1. Typo appeared in the stats table in NetEpic 5 (first Netepic revision with the last pages stats table) and has never been detected before

Warlock and Phantom uses exactly the same chassis (warlock has just a warlock head and some psy powers), I do not see any good reason to let the Phantom Titan getting a better move.

Hi !

About the Avatar : there is no indication about its pinned class. If my remembrances are good, Avatar is Knight class but it is process like walkers for the movment.

Can you confirm ?

Looking at the Eldar Titans now for converting the Hit Location values, and I'm noticing that they have Reactor locations in their Front arc (Phantom and Warlock both do). I am looking at the 'eldar_with_errata.pdf'. Early in this thread it was stated that Eldar Titans were expected to lose that vulnerability. Why didn't they?

Hi,

Flamewings (AA wing for eldar titans) miss "Always on FF" like the others AA weapons of titans at the other army.

And we must rewrite unicorns text (actually the text talk about 3 lines but there are only two unicorns per detachment).