Been mulling through the obvious 'spam' list, and it still comes up at 10 formations, or potentially 9x formations all containing leaders, which leaves us where we were before. I think you are correct in your earlier post that this is still likely to be somewhat OTT (I have an idea that the sweetspot is around 9x formations and 6x leaders). So, I tried hashing around some figures and comparisons etc. and came up with the following suggestions:-
1) Eldar armies that include Harlequins may either have an Autarch or a Great Harlequin, not both. Where the majority of formations are Harlequins, the Great Harlequin must be included to lead them.
(Enforcing the use of the Great Harlequin is both characterfull and helps control 'Harlequin spam'.
Also this was an oversight - I don't think the army should have two SC saves, do you
)
2) Increase cost of Great Harlequin to 125
(this compensates for the Laughing god concept).
3) Increase cost of all Harlequin leaders to 50 points, and add commander to all.
(This allows Harlequins to lead other Eldar into battle, which seems characterfull and compensates for 'Leader' etc.)
4) Increase cost of Harlequin formation to 325 points.
(This is justified by the individual cost of each Harlequin at 65 points given all the extras they have. It also allows us to tweak the overall cost of the army.)
So now the 'Spam' all Harlequin army is 3x Harlequin Troupes, 6x Harlequin Jet bike Promenades, the Great Harlequin and 5x Troupe leaders; 9 formations and 6x leaders for a total of 3000 points.
One last, left-field thought; Could we associate the Great Harlequin with a Wraithgate as well? If so, the Wraithgate wording would look like this:
Quote:
The Eldar player may choose to replace one of the Objective markers in his half of the table with Wraithgates at a cost of 50 points, or for free if the Great Harlequin is taken. There may only be a maximum of one wraithgate per army even if Eldar Allies are taken.
What do you think?