I am in WA, which is GMT +8.
I work a flexible schedule since some of my work is in the US or UK, so could do a weekday (which I think would be 9am here = 1am UK, or 1pm here = 5pm New Zealand for example).
Quote:
nice, didn't realise it was so popular! I hadn't used it for years until this week. For that sort of competitive play do you use the vassals built in dice rolling system, or a third party site?
The built in dice, always.
They have been tested to destruction sinand found to be adequate for international tournaments, results are here:
http://teamcovenant.com/mu0n/2013/10/21 ... -analysis/http://teamcovenant.com/vorpalsword/201 ... till-fine/"I ran a different kind of test on the same data set Rekkon generated. I computed Cramer’s V, which is closely related to Pearson’s chi-squared test. Essentially, what this does is spit out a value between 0 and 1 that indicates the level of association between two variables—in this case, between this die result and the next die result. (If you know what a correlation coefficient means, Cramer’s V is the same sort of indicator.) Cramer’s V is preferable to a chi-squared test because they tend to break down with large samples like this one.
Here is the worksheet I used. The association between this die result and the next die result, on a scale from 0 to 1, is 0.03.
So what I found is that results are not clumping together in Vassal, or at least not any more often than you would expect in a random sequence"
etc

For terrain, it's always what the players agree before the game, and the infinite height terrain the UK favours is the simplest to use on Vassal anyway since it's a 2D view. Sound good?