Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

CHS vs. GW verdict.

 Post subject: CHS vs. GW verdict.
PostPosted: Fri Jun 14, 2013 11:15 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 4682
Location: Wheaton, IL
http://www.lounge.belloflostsouls.net/s ... se-Verdict

bigred wrote:
We have a verdict!

Some initial notes:
This is a Jury Verdict, and has not yet become a Final Judgement

Breaking down the counts along the different categories we have:

Copyright Claims
160 claims alleged against CHS
-GW won on 1/3 of the claims, including items such as CHS' Powerfists
-CHS won on 2/3 of the claims, including the use of the underlying shape and size of GW Shoulderpads.

General Trademark Claims
9 claims alleged against CHS
-CHS won all 9 claims, including either no infringement, or fair use of the GW trademarks on CHS' website.

Disputed Trademark Claims
21 disputed trademark claims alleged against CHS
CHS won 11 claims
GW won 10 claims

GW Trademarks ruled "Previously Used in Commerce" Claims
61 claims alleged against CHS
CHS won 35 claims
GW won 27

Notable Trends and Individual Products Under Dispute
CHS lost on some individual products including:
-Doomseer
-Dark Elf

CHS won on some individual products including:
-Jetbike
-Super-heavy walker model
-Lizard Ogre

Damages Awarded:
CHS ordered to pay GW damages of $25,000 USD

Both sides may appeal the ruling.

Thoughts and Implications:
It's looking like however CHS as an entity comes out of this ruling, the implications for the 3rd party industry are profound.

-The ruling of no infringement for the use of the underlying shape and size of GW shoulderpads is now on the legal record.
-Possibly more important is not guilty verdicts on the use of GW trademarks and terms on the CHS website.
-While certain CHS products themselves may disappear from the Earth in the aftermath of this case, it looks like the verdict may have provided a clear blueprint for the 3rd party accessory bits market. One that allows legal use of certain GW trademarks and terms in a way that goes way beyond what Nottingham themselves ever wished to allow.

More details as we get it... Documents will be coming in time.

_________________
SG

Ghost's Paint Blog, where everything goes that isn't something else.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: CHS vs. GW verdict.
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 12:10 am 
Hybrid
Hybrid
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 8:30 pm
Posts: 4234
Location: Greenville, SC
Interesting, curious to see a list of exactly what was won by who.

_________________
-Vaaish


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: CHS vs. GW verdict.
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 12:18 am 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:04 pm
Posts: 6006
Location: UK
Interesting, thanks for posting, had fallen off my radar :)

_________________
AFK with real life, still checking PMs


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: CHS vs. GW verdict.
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 1:21 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:01 pm
Posts: 2518
Location: California
Vaaish wrote:
Interesting, curious to see a list of exactly what was won by who.
Apocolocyntosis wrote:
Interesting, thanks for posting, had fallen off my radar :)


I agree on both accounts. I'm glad someone finally stood up to the bullying* of GW. Now it seems that GW has lost more ground then they had if they left them alone. Severs them right for losing focus of the gamers and paying more attention to profits.


* Before someone yells at me I understand they need to protect their IP and such but that could have easily worked with CHS and other company's or possible Ventures like E&C. Plus there regard for assuming everything is their IP when we all know where it really came from originally, just because they rip from lots of places at once doesn't make it their IP.

_________________
My NetEA Lists:
Fir Iolarion Titan Clan List
Dark Angels List

Always looking to Trade!
Angel's Trade Thread


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: CHS vs. GW verdict.
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 2:42 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:24 pm
Posts: 9662
Location: Manalapan, FL
The GW Can Do No Wrong crowd are already arriving like flies to cow turd on that thread.

_________________
He's a lawyer and a super-villian. That's like having a shark with a bazooka!

-I HAVE NO POINT
-Penal Legion-Fan list
-Help me make Whitescars not suck!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: CHS vs. GW verdict.
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 8:40 am 
Swarm Tyrant
Swarm Tyrant
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 6:22 pm
Posts: 9350
Location: Singapore
Wow. I did not expect CHS to come out of that so well, to be honest. I think that it speaks a lot of the aggressive nature of GW claiming on 'generic' designs and terms. This is going to have echoes for a long time in the hobby.....






...(tm) ;)

_________________
https://www.cybershadow.ninja - A brief look into my twisted world, including wargames and beyond.
https://www.net-armageddon.org - The official NetEA (Epic Armageddon) site and resource.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: CHS vs. GW verdict.
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 9:14 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2008 9:32 pm
Posts: 2455
Location: Cardiff, wales
so the doomseer is gone but not the jetbike? hmm.

_________________
My shifting projects


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: CHS vs. GW verdict.
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 9:27 am 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 9:04 pm
Posts: 6006
Location: UK
jimmyzimms wrote:
The GW Can Do No Wrong crowd are already arriving like flies to cow turd on that thread.

I was a bit surprised as well, always some (fair enough, entitled to their view) but I suppose different forums have different overall feelings on things.

_________________
AFK with real life, still checking PMs


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: CHS vs. GW verdict.
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 11:26 am 
Swarm Tyrant
Swarm Tyrant
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 6:22 pm
Posts: 9350
Location: Singapore
The thing is, this kind of issue is always going to be there, and is only going to become more significant as the entry price to produce 3P items and parts becomes easier. We are on the doorstep of home use 3D printers, and anyone with £1000 and basic web and design skills will be able to produce parts and add-ons and throw up an online store.

In fact, the wargame industry is actually well behind the curve with this kind of thing, and has been fairly insulated from it.

There is a huge industry of 'unofficial' Transformers products - both add-on and conversion kits, as well as full figures - which has grown hugely in the last 5 years. I own a few myself. There, they cater for the collector, a market that Hasbro largely ignores.

For example, this is NOT an official Hasbro or licensed product;

Image

Games Workshop are going to have to take the same stance that most companies, such as Hasbro, do - They dont like the practice and they dont encourage it, but really there is not much that they can do about it while its a relatively small market sector. The best way to compete against this kind of thing - and something that Hasbro and Takara are starting to be aware to - is to produce these items themselves. In general, people will only go outside of GW if GW dont produce what they want, or charge too much for it. That doesnt make it 'right' or 'fair' or legal, but its the way it is. If both GW and CHS produce equivalent products at the same price, the majority of people would just buy the GW version.

_________________
https://www.cybershadow.ninja - A brief look into my twisted world, including wargames and beyond.
https://www.net-armageddon.org - The official NetEA (Epic Armageddon) site and resource.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: CHS vs. GW verdict.
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 12:00 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2011 3:04 pm
Posts: 2757
CyberShadow wrote:
The best way to compete against this kind of thing - and something that Hasbro and Takara are starting to be aware to - is to produce these items themselves. In general, people will only go outside of GW if GW dont produce what they want, or charge too much for it. That doesnt make it 'right' or 'fair' or legal, but its the way it is. If both GW and CHS produce equivalent products at the same price, the majority of people would just buy the GW version.


Sums it up nicely. A good day indeed, and I was not surprised. Maybe there is still time to stop your lawyers from hiring more lawyers and focus instead on creative business models, but frankly my dear GW, I really dont give a damn anymore.

_________________
Nitpicks Knapsack (Scratchbuilding and 3D designing and printing and painting)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: CHS vs. GW verdict.
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 1:45 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm
Posts: 36989
Location: Ohio - USA
Hmmm ... interesting score ... GW certainly has made some enemies ... as well as some friends/Fanboyz ... Regardless they laugh/cry all the way to the bank ... :whistle

_________________
Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: CHS vs. GW verdict.
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 2:03 pm 
Hybrid
Hybrid
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 11:25 pm
Posts: 9539
Location: Worcester, MA
Having to pay out 25k to GW seems like a hollow victory. Between that and the legal fees I'm left wondering if they'll be around much longer.

_________________
Dave

Blog

NetEA Tournament Pack Website

Squats 2019-10-17


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: CHS vs. GW verdict.
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 2:28 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 8:16 pm
Posts: 4682
Location: Wheaton, IL
First, it's pro bono representation for CHS. Second, apparently in the testimony CHS claimed to have brought in $400k over the last four years. 25k is large, but not game changing. And there's still appeals to make, remember.

_________________
SG

Ghost's Paint Blog, where everything goes that isn't something else.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: CHS vs. GW verdict.
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 2:28 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 07, 2010 4:57 am
Posts: 880
Location: Noblesville, Indiana
Dave wrote:
Having to pay out 25k to GW seems like a hollow victory. Between that and the legal fees I'm left wondering if they'll be around much longer.


I think they'll be fine. They might have support behind the scenes that can cover this expense for them--I said might I don't really have any insider info on this. But even if they can't handle it and they fold, which naïve and desperate GW fanbois will trumpet as a victory, this ruling isn't just about CHS. It now opens the door for other companies. What may end up being a minor victory for GW if this happens in the short term, will turn out to be a major loss for them in the long run.

And, of course, GW doesn't have the insight to see it that way. It will be business as usual from them.

_________________
http://thorvirshobbydumpster.blogspot.com/

Tau Empire, Mymeara Eldar, Tallarn Desert Raiders


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: CHS vs. GW verdict.
PostPosted: Sat Jun 15, 2013 7:51 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 8:54 pm
Posts: 2279
Location: Cornwall
Difficult to see how this will pan out long term, but one thing for sure, GWs legal team weren't expecting this when they sent that off the shelf cease and desist letter to two guys in their garage! ;-) Will hopefully make them wary about sending more...

And CHS just got an ad campaign they couldn't buy - even with $25k!

and,

If the rumour that tom kirby is looking to sell his controlling stock is also true then his share price just took a big hit... kids will have to wait for those trust funds ! ;-)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 47 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net