- Corrected
- Corrected
- Corrected
- Name changed to reflect the difference.
- No
frogbear wrote:
Overall it looks to be that you have taken the World Eaters and added more and changed some things.
So then a different list then?
frogbear wrote:
The World Eaters is in a Developmental state with a history of many games to bring it to that stage.
As you keep saying... but this isn't a major issue with a fledgling list IMO.
frogbear wrote:
I do not believe you should be changing things for no reason.
Good thing I didn't then.
frogbear wrote:
This list should really take on a Warband feel rather than a "World Eaters but not World Eaters" force.
Even though you didn't think my World Eaters list was World Eaters enough?

Having World Eaters present doesn't mean they are the focus. They are essentially "mercenaries" in this force. A small part of a larger list. They'll follow your list's stats design. That's enough. And the list will take the direction I feel I'd like it to take. WE should be warbands. Raiding Khorne forces don't need to be that. They can be more organised.
frogbear wrote:
There are a lot of Marine elements that could make room for a different type of force more in line with societies that value combat over civilisation. This includes the desperate and mis-aligned.
Then that would be a different type of force.
frogbear wrote:
I liked the idea of Terminators in with base units and maybe you should go along with that again to gain the 'warband' feel.
Thanks. They do - in the WE section. It's a carry over from my original WE idea.
frogbear wrote:
Large armies of mutants (without EA+1) who are sensed into battle without a care for themselves
Nope. That would essentially be a LatD list. Mine is a Khorne-worshipping Marine list with planetary allies in uprising/insurgence. If the mutants are deemed needing a change then so be it. You might notice their CC stat went down from 4+ to 2x5+ as well - why make something the same when you have scope to perhaps adjust it slightly. I don't like homogeneity that much.
frogbear wrote:
Too Cheap
- One or Two Lords of Battle 400 points each
- One or Two Brass Scorpions 150 points each
- Corrected
- nope it's not a Greater Brass Scorpion.
frogbear wrote:
Is it an old list that you are comparing stats and prices to or are all the changes purposeful?
A little of column A a little of column B and a couple oversights in between.
frogbear wrote:
I also notice the WE Terminators with 3 attacks.
Corrected.