I personally couldn't get a good idea of community feeling in the War Walker cost debate, so I was just wondering if we could get some hands in the air?

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter

I don't mind the 4-6 @ 35pt ea. I usually take a formation of 5 and a formation of six rangers, and interlock them, forming an especially resilient scout screen. However, if there is a real push against the current pricing, my next choice would be 4 @ 150 with option for 1-2 @ 25 ea.

_________________
SG

Ghost's Paint Blog, where everything goes that isn't something else.

Not 35 points each. Either of the other options is fine.

Option 1 or 3.

_________________
http://hordesofthings.blogspot.co.nz/

Ditto Neal, Markonz

Yup, 1 or 3.

_________________
"I don't believe in destiny or the guiding hand of fate." N. Peart

I like the 200pts for six option best. It seems to reflect the slightly restrictive, tradition-bound feeling of the Eldar.

Rangers don't have that, as they're much more free.

_________________
Industrious, red-robe wearing member of the PCRC

<-- Heretic. Voted for what it is currently (@35ea!)

Currently, removing the "No opinion" votes:

- 6 units for 200pts has 50% support,
- 4 units for 150pts with an upgrade of 1-2 units for 25pts each has 41.6% support
- 4-6 units for 35pts each has 8.3% support

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter

so either option 1 or 3, and I suspect most are fairly ambivalent about which is actually used.

With the official rule being option 1, I'd say inertia should probably work in its favour, unless there's a majority who want change.

_________________
Currently doing a plastic scenery kickstarter