Quote: (Morgan Vening @ Dec. 02 2009, 19:38 )
I think AA3+ is a bit much. On CAP or Intercept, that's 3x2+. Given most fighter formations are twins, anything that doesn't have all round AA is toast more often than not. Yes, it's inferior to what it is now, but I think it's too good at the moment.
So 2x4+ is too good, 2+ is still too good, what's next, 3+?
Quote:
I'd much rather see it converted the same way all existing twin-mounts get, with the AA getting +1 for a 4+ (3+ on CAP and Intercept).
That's pretty poor though. Same hits as a thunderbolt formation, less range, ground firepower slightly worse. You would want them as 150 for 3?
Personally I do like them as 3 strong formations though since they are meant to be light fighter swarms (hell, I'd prefer them with no save for the same reason).
_________________
If using E-Bay use this link to support Tac Com!'Abolish red trousers?! Never! Red trousers are France!' – Eugene Etienne, War Minister, 1913
"Gentlemen, we may not make history tomorrow, but we shall certainly change the geography."
General Plumer, 191x