Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 4 posts ] 

Leman Russ Demolisher
The_Real_Chris
 Post subject: Leman Russ Demolisher
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 6:10 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 4:45 pm
Posts: 8139
Location: London
Well though i must wait until the 29th at the earlist to play a game I can still report on the experience of a couple of friends. They both play the three base races (though Orks are used infrequently, normally it is guard vs marines) and are fans of the demolisher.

This fandom has increased witht he proposed change I relayed to them.

There suggestion which has so far been tried once and seemed fine was to make the sponson weapons 30cm AP5+/AT5+ and lose slow fire. Not only did this make the impact at 30cm roughly what it was before but made admin easier, with a number in use every game they always forget which ones have fired and haven't.

I must say I quite like this. It removes book keeping, could indeed make any change neutral to the LR Demolisher and removes an 'infantry level' slow fire wepaon from the game (come on, 15 minutes of ifre then 15 minutes to recharge/change power cells?). Also as I think these are the only units to use the weapon it wouldn't impact anything else.

_________________
If using E-Bay use this link to support Tac Com!
'Abolish red trousers?! Never! Red trousers are France!' – Eugene Etienne, War Minister, 1913
"Gentlemen, we may not make history tomorrow, but we shall certainly change the geography."
General Plumer, 191x
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Soren
 Post subject: Leman Russ Demolisher
PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 12:07 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 9:42 am
Posts: 694
Location: Austria
Why not. but keep it at 4+/4+. Simply erade slow firing and that would be easy bookkeeping. Do not alter the main gun ( no MW) and I think the plasma upgrade thingie is a good compensation to the 75cm - 30cm range reduction over the Leman Russ. 5+ makes it not really better than a heavy bolter which is not rally the case I think. (and the possibility to shoot on tanks is a meager bonus over a h. bolter, as you can only shoot on eighter type)




_________________
Attrition is the proof of absence of Strategy
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
The_Real_Chris
 Post subject: Leman Russ Demolisher
PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 1:28 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 4:45 pm
Posts: 8139
Location: London
I think 4/4 is a bit to powerful, 5/5 seems more like an infantry heavy weapon. Also the idea is not to power up the unit further!

_________________
If using E-Bay use this link to support Tac Com!
'Abolish red trousers?! Never! Red trousers are France!' – Eugene Etienne, War Minister, 1913
"Gentlemen, we may not make history tomorrow, but we shall certainly change the geography."
General Plumer, 191x
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
zombocom
 Post subject: Leman Russ Demolisher
PostPosted: Tue Dec 25, 2007 2:37 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 1:49 am
Posts: 5569
5/5 non slow firing seems pretty reaonable.

_________________
http://www.troublemakergames.co.uk/
Epic: Hive Development Thread
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 4 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net