![]() ![]() |
Page 3 of 8 |
[ 106 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8 Next |
Tau Empires - Vespid Stingwings |
|||||||
tneva82 |
|
||||||
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:17 pm Posts: 606 |
|
||||||
Top | |
||||||
![]() |
Xisor |
|
||||
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 10:11 pm Posts: 515 |
|
||||
Top | |
||||
![]() |
tneva82 |
|
||||||
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:17 pm Posts: 606 |
|
||||||
Top | |
||||||
![]() |
ragnarok |
|
|||||
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 2:43 pm Posts: 2084 Location: Reading, England |
|
|||||
Top | |
|||||
![]() |
Nerroth |
|
|||||
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 12:00 pm Posts: 573 Location: Canada |
|
|||||
Top | |
|||||
![]() |
Tactica |
|
||||||
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am Posts: 2241 |
I've sat silent on this for a page or so to hear what others thought. This question Cw (and Xisor) poses is really the crux of the matter right now. My gut feeling on page 1 is clear - its a 12" gun, how can it be a ranged attack? My initial concern on page 1 is also clear I think - the E:A Tau army would obviously be great in FF if we were to purely port over from 40K - but for other reasons, we are not going down that path. The list is working by NOT going down that path. So we have a design principle to avoid making the E:A Tau 'good' at FF or CC in E:A. The precidnet is to have artificially reduced FF stats and artificially increased ranges as a result. Xisor brings up a good point I had not considered on page 1 when making the above comments - fusion blasters. ?Our crisis suits have fusion blasters that are 12" range and which equate to 15cm guns. Someone else makse the comment that our E:A fusion blasters may take into account the 40K 'evasion' ability of the crisis jet pack and that the range is thus justified. A fair argument. However, the artificial range increase argument for the fusion blaster is also valid as its a key Tau anti-armor piece of gear. Furthermore, I consider things like 18" burst cannons which are also below the standard 24" range weapon or more before you get an E:A stat. All of our 18" range weapons are artificially bumped to E:A 15cm weapons - again to account for our artificial FF deficiency. Thus far, an abstraction which has proven to work to get us this far. So, with some addition thought on this topic in mind, I went back to the Tau Empires codex last night for some additional input. As Vespids do not fill a h-t-h combat role for the Tau 1) in core design fictional history or 2) in 40K developer's implimentation of the unit in 40k game play, I take notice of that. Knowing that all tau would be good in FF if we purely ported them from E:A - and knowing that we avoid doing that for good reasons - namely, those units are not supposed to be good in combat (Tau Perspective = that's what kroot are for!) I'm apprehensive ?about stepping over this established design principle and 'boundary' in E:A with any unit/formation that's not directly intended for combat in design fictional history or in 40K game play. The more important question on my mind is - how do we want the Tau ARMY in E:A to work, regardless of name of unit (Tau or Auxilia), if the unit/formation is not supposed to be good/excepitonal in combat? I think the vespids would probably be a FF4+ if they were strictly ported from 40K to E:A. There may even be an argument for 3+ if you consider the bonus for marked targets, their ability to give every infantry man in the unit a power armor eviserating weapon with a strength higher than a super human marines toughness, but all that aside, I think they would safely be a FF4+ if we were to port them over. So that means I do not want to see FF4+ on the Vespids. I also agree with Steele, 2 FF shots here is not the way we want to go as its another unnecessary E:A Engage enhancement that's not aligning with the E:A Tau army design principles. 2 regular shots at close range - well, maybe, but not right now either as better to play it safe and give us somewhere to start that going overboard from the get go. So I'm definitely on board with only 1 FF shot per unit and 1 regular shot per unit to start with. Following our E:A Tau design principles, I think I'm convinced that they NEED to be FF5+. Their potensy of weapon clearly makes them justification for a AP4+ quality shot. For reasons of wings vs technology, being naturally great at flying, being great at navigating terrain and dangerous terrain in flight, and due to them also being able to fleet of wing to gain further movement - I'm in full support of ragnarok's comment about them being 35cm movement - just as the swooping hawk eldar unit is. This just makes sense to me. Marine Toughness but IG armor in 40K means they are somewhere inbetween a 5+ and a 6+ save in E:A. They are supposed to be better armoured Orks essentially from a 40K defensive stand point but not as armored as Tau. So when also factoring their speed in flight, that puts them squarely on a 5+ armor value to me in E:A. Formation vs. Upgrade I've not formed a solid opinion on yet. I'd be happy to try 4 Unit Tau Upgrade and 8 Unit Formation that Hena (I think) suggested. As far as who gets the upgrade, I think Xisor's point is well met about the formation integrating with the Tau moreso even than the Kroot or human Auxilia - and both of those are heavily integrated. I could see them being an upgrade for either of the E:A Tau infantry Cadres (FW or Crisis). Points suggestions appear to be from the 25-35 point a Unit range but that was in context of 2 shots per stand in FF and a FF4+ value - which would make this formation very valuable to the way Tau play. Now, with only 1 shot per stand and that being relegated to 15cm range and the unit no longer filling a much desired speedy quality engagement role, 25 points as stand seems like a reasonable place to start. So in summary, I propose the following: Vespids Stingwings 1) ?CONTINGENT of 8 Units = ?200 points 2) ?FW & Crisis Cadres UPGRADE of 4 Units = ?+100 points Type ? ? ? ? ? ? Infantry Speed ? ? ? ? ? 35cm Armour ? ? ? ? ?5+ Close Combat 6+ Firefight ? ? ? ?5+ Weapon ? ? ? ? ? ? Range ?Firepower ?Notes Neutron Blasters ? ?15cm ? ? AP4+ ? ? ? ? ?-- Notes: Jump Packs Cheers, _________________ Rob |
Xisor |
|
||||
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2005 10:11 pm Posts: 515 |
|
||||
Top | |
||||
![]() |
Tactica |
|
||||
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am Posts: 2241 |
|
||||
Top | |
||||
![]() |
semajnollissor |
|
|||||
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 6:38 pm Posts: 1673 Location: Chattanooga, TN, USA |
|
|||||
Top | |
|||||
![]() |
semajnollissor |
|
|||||||
Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 6:38 pm Posts: 1673 Location: Chattanooga, TN, USA |
|
|||||||
Top | |
|||||||
![]() |
Print view | Previous topic | Next topic |
![]() ![]() |
Page 3 of 8 |
[ 106 posts ] | Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 8 Next |
Who is online |
|
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests |
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum |