Login |  Register |  FAQ
   
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 2
  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Daemons and unit breaking
Chroma
 Post subject: Daemons and unit breaking
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 9:47 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
When a unit breaks from shooting attacks, any accompanying daemons are removed from play.  

Now, if a unit loses an engage, do the daemons vanish first, or can the Chaos player elect to take "hack down" hits on daemons first, saving non-daemonic units from damage?

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
wraeththu
 Post subject: Daemons and unit breaking
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 10:01 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 6:34 pm
Posts: 231
Quote (Chroma @ 19 Jan. 2006 (15:47))

When a unit breaks from shooting attacks, any accompanying daemons are removed from play. ?

Now, if a unit loses an engage, do the daemons vanish first, or can the Chaos player elect to take "hack down" hits on daemons first, saving non-daemonic units from damage?


I don't see where I put, ?"When a unit breaks from shooting attacks, any accompanying daemons are removed from play."

It says break period. ?So when in an assault I have played that the formation breaks first which removes all summoned units, then you do the "hack down" casualties.

"If the losing formation is not broken then it becomes broken and may withdraw (see 1.13.3). In addition, the losing formation suffers a number of extra hits equal to the difference between the two sides? result scores."

-Audrey

_________________
My Oubliette: http://audreysoubliette.wordpress.com
Old archive: http://oubliette.tranquility-base.us/
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Chroma
 Post subject: Daemons and unit breaking
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 10:06 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote (wraeththu @ 19 Jan. 2006 (21:01))
I don't see where I put, ?"When a unit breaks from shooting attacks, any accompanying daemons are removed from play."

It says break period. ?So when in an assault I have played that the formation breaks first which removes all summoned units, then you do the "hack down" casualties.

"If the losing formation is not broken then it becomes broken and may withdraw (see 1.13.3). In addition, the losing formation suffers a number of extra hits equal to the difference between the two sides? result scores."

Oh, I never said you put that anywhere wraeththu, I was just clarifying on shooting.

I'm just trying to determine in what order breaking and withdrawing and hack-down hits occur in a lost engage.  They appear to be, in the rules, simultaneous effects, eg, you break and suffer the hack-downs, and then withdrawl.

I've been playing it that the daemons go away as soon as the unit loses the engage, but played against a Black Legion opponent on the weekend that wanted to take the hack-down hits on daemons first and then remove whatever daemons were still left and withdraw.

I couldn't find a definitive order that satisfied him and that's the way he'd been playing it with his group.  It certainly made it harder to wipe out his formations.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
nealhunt
 Post subject: Daemons and unit breaking
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2006 10:55 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
So when in an assault I have played that the formation breaks first which removes all summoned units, then you do the "hack down" casualties.


Hmmm... I always did the opposite - take the hackdown hits first.  I always pictured the "vanish into the warp" as being similar to the rest of the force doing its withdrawal move.  The hack-down hits are still allocated closest first, so it's not always allocated to the daemons but they do tend to take the bulk of hits.

If I had to guess, I'd say most people were doing that.  In particular, there have been a lot of discussions regarding Thousand Sons and Flamers where people said they would lead with the TSons for the better armor and keep the Flamers back to protect them from potential countercharge which resulted in larger numbers of lost units.  Obviously, the number of units would be the same no matter how they were arranged if the daemons left first.

Definitely rates at least an FAQ.

_________________
Neal
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
wraeththu
 Post subject: Daemons and unit breaking
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2006 4:56 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 6:34 pm
Posts: 231
Quote (nealhunt @ 19 Jan. 2006 (16:55))
Hmmm... I always did the opposite - take the hackdown hits first. ?I always pictured the "vanish into the warp" as being similar to the rest of the force doing its withdrawal move. ?The hack-down hits are still allocated closest first, so it's not always allocated to the daemons but they do tend to take the bulk of hits.

Put that way it does makes a point for your case as well. ?Obviously there was no delineation as to what the correct order is. ?The original rules make the "hack downs" and breaking of the formations seem simultaneous. ?The point about taking the closest casualties first makes me think you should take the "hack downs" from all the units on the formation (including daemons) before the unit breaks, flees and the daemons are removed.

-Audrey

_________________
My Oubliette: http://audreysoubliette.wordpress.com
Old archive: http://oubliette.tranquility-base.us/
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Chroma
 Post subject: Daemons and unit breaking
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 7:52 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Has this issue been resolved?

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
nealhunt
 Post subject: Daemons and unit breaking
PostPosted: Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:17 pm 
Purestrain
Purestrain

Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
I think it was decided that hackdowns first, then daemons vanish, but that may just be my confirmation bias.
:D

_________________
Neal
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
wraeththu
 Post subject: Daemons and unit breaking
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 2:11 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 6:34 pm
Posts: 231
You take hackdown casualties first (which can included daemons).

-Audrey

_________________
My Oubliette: http://audreysoubliette.wordpress.com
Old archive: http://oubliette.tranquility-base.us/
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Chroma
 Post subject: Daemons and unit breaking
PostPosted: Wed Apr 05, 2006 6:19 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Any answers on the Great Daemon critical, Audrey?

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Irondeath
 Post subject: Daemons and unit breaking
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 8:52 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 12:36 pm
Posts: 653
Really nice. We have been playing this with daemons vanishing first and applying hack-downs then, as anything else felt like cheating. Ironically, GDs are Fearless and therefore not eligible for taking hack-down hits... giving LDs Fearless as well would resolve the matter neatly IMO.

_________________
Visit www.epic-battles.de the ultimate german epic site&forum!
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
wraeththu
 Post subject: Daemons and unit breaking
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 6:20 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 19, 2004 6:34 pm
Posts: 231
Quote (Irondeath @ 20 April 2006 (15:52))
Really nice. We have been playing this with daemons vanishing first and applying hack-downs then, as anything else felt like cheating.

Well surprising enough the "cheating way" is the correct way. ?:D

I do not see Fearless being added to the LD.

-Audrey

_________________
My Oubliette: http://audreysoubliette.wordpress.com
Old archive: http://oubliette.tranquility-base.us/
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Tactica
 Post subject: Daemons and unit breaking
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 8:36 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am
Posts: 2241
The folks I seen using chaos (our group has abandoned them) were doing this the way Audrey was doing it.

LOL, like irondeath, I thought the other way was cheating!

Ironically, BL has been doing great in the games I've seen - even with taking additional casualties after the deamons vanish. This change will make things err... better for the BL.

Hmm, from my experience, this seems like a really bad interpretation / decision by the powers that be.

I hope more playtest is given on this front before the chaos hit the presses.

Cheers,

_________________
Rob
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
The_Real_Chris
 Post subject: Daemons and unit breaking
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 4:55 am 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 4:45 pm
Posts: 8139
Location: London
Oh, and all those 3bp ignore cover MW's you can get :)

_________________
If using E-Bay use this link to support Tac Com!
'Abolish red trousers?! Never! Red trousers are France!' – Eugene Etienne, War Minister, 1913
"Gentlemen, we may not make history tomorrow, but we shall certainly change the geography."
General Plumer, 191x
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Chroma
 Post subject: Daemons and unit breaking
PostPosted: Sat Apr 22, 2006 2:15 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 9684
Location: Montréal, QC, Canada
Quote (The_Real_Chris @ 22 April 2006 (04:55))
Oh, and all those 3bp ignore cover MW's you can get :)

Well, that's more of an issue with Black Legion than LatD.

I still think Daemons should disappear/be immune to hack-downs (and that's all giving them fearless would do, as they'd still disappear when their parent formation breaks) as I see it as more plausible that the Daemons would leave their mortal followers to be slaughtered than stick around.

In fact, it seems to be a variation on the "Daemon Shield" effect against shooting, that we really worked to diminish, raising its ugly head again.

_________________
"EPIC: Total War" Lead Developer

Now living in Boston... any EPIC players want to meet up?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Irondeath
 Post subject: Daemons and unit breaking
PostPosted: Sun Apr 23, 2006 4:38 pm 
Brood Brother
Brood Brother
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 12:36 pm
Posts: 653
Indeed, and that?s why I proposed Fearless. Solves the matter without further ado for no side effect, as this ability otherwise only relates to being broken, which the LD?s cannot be as they have disappeared by then.

_________________
Visit www.epic-battles.de the ultimate german epic site&forum!
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 2
  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  


Powered by phpBB ® Forum Software © phpBB Group
CoDFaction Style by Daniel St. Jules of Gamexe.net