Eldar 'Armour' |
Mojarn Piett
|
Post subject: Eldar 'Armour' Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 11:13 am |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 14, 2003 7:35 am Posts: 5455 Location: Finland
|
IIRC it's 75mm.
_________________ I don't know and I let who care. -J.S.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Legion 4
|
Post subject: Eldar 'Armour' Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:05 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm Posts: 36989 Location: Ohio - USA
|
Thought it was 73mm ... let's Check Janes - BMP-1 =73; BMP-2 =30; BMP-3 =100 & 30mm; BMD-1 = 73; BMD-2&3 = 30mm ... And MICV is still in the Janes Gloosary ! 
_________________ Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Lion in the Stars
|
Post subject: Eldar 'Armour' Posted: Tue Jan 10, 2006 5:33 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 11:01 pm Posts: 1455
|
I thought MICV (Mechanized Infantry Combat Vehicle) was pretty much an upgunned M113 ACAV that still hauls grunts, and an IFV (Infantry Fighting Vehicle) is a 'heavily' armed and armored vehicle like a Bradley/LAV25.
I know the USArmy seems to like 'Infantry Fighting Vehicle' or 'Cavalry Fighting Vehicle' to describe Bradleys.
_________________ "For the Lion and the Emperor!"
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Legion 4
|
Post subject: Eldar 'Armour' Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2006 5:39 am |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm Posts: 36989 Location: Ohio - USA
|
Yes, the Brad is an IFV or CFV depending on configuration and employment. ?The M113 ACAV is basically an M113 APC (I commanded a Co. of these.), with minor modifications, like the Bradley IFV and CFV ... ?MICV is a generic term, like APC, IFV, MBT, etc. ... But generally an MICV is referred to as an IFV ... 
_________________ Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Ginger
|
Post subject: Eldar 'Armour' Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 7:10 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2005 7:20 pm Posts: 5483 Location: London, UK
|
- - - and then there is the Israeli Merkava MBT, which can also carry a small Infantry squad internally under complete armored protection.
_________________ "Play up and play the game"
Vitai lampada Sir Hemry Newbolt
|
|
Top |
|
 |
zak
|
Post subject: Eldar 'Armour' Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2006 7:38 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 11:57 am Posts: 104 Location: Irvine , Ayrshire ,Scotland
|
So the Merkava (Chariot) , is the closest thing to a Land-Raider.
It also has the engine in the front to take the hits instead of the crew.
_________________ "The Emperor Protects"
.........Commissar Zak
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Legion 4
|
Post subject: Eldar 'Armour' Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 5:47 am |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm Posts: 36989 Location: Ohio - USA
|
That was sometimes in the West believed to be true...
However the large rear access hatch was really designed for rapid ammo reload based on their experience in the '73 War. ?
However, I've never been it a Merkava, so I don't know if it could hold any troops other than the crew.
_________________ Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
|
|
Top |
|
 |
MaksimSmelchak
|
Post subject: Eldar 'Armour' Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 4:50 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2003 4:43 pm Posts: 7258 Location: Sacramento, California, USA
|
Hi Ginger,
Quote (Ginger @ 12 Jan. 2006 (18:10)) | ...and then there is the Israeli Merkava MBT, which can also carry a small Infantry squad internally under complete armored protection. |
L-4 is spot on. The rear compartment was originally designed for rapid ammunition replenishment.
In 1982, there was a lot of ruban combat and the M-113 APC proved very vulnerable is an environment full of RPGs and HMGs so, removing some Markava ammo and extricating casualties in a TRULY ARMORED hull proved to be one of the only viable solutions possible.
However, the price is that alot of ammunition has to be given up to carry that infantry. Tactically, that capability is only used in extreme situations or occasionally to get high priority troops to the front such as tank hunters or special forces.
The other more likely option is that high priority soldiers will be transported to the front in obselete MBTs that have been converted into APCs. The Israelis have done this with captured T-55s and even British Centurions. Many of the world's other armies are now following suite with the practice of converted obselete MBTs into APCs including Russia.
I think a more likely analogue to the Landraider would be some of the indigenous South African APCs.
Shalom, Maksim-Smelchak.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Legion 4
|
Post subject: Eldar 'Armour' Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2006 5:00 pm |
|
Brood Brother |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 5:13 pm Posts: 36989 Location: Ohio - USA
|
Thanks, M/S!
Checked Janes... didn't mention anything about carrying troops, either!
But I do like the IDF using "looted" Russkie/Arab MBTs converted to APCs!
Saw them on the news and on the GHQ site, IIRC! 
_________________ Legion 4 "Cry Havoc, and let slip the Dogs of War !" ... "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
|
|
Top |
|
 |
CyberShadow
|
Post subject: Eldar 'Armour' Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2006 5:20 pm |
|
Swarm Tyrant |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2003 6:22 pm Posts: 9350 Location: Singapore
|
OK... to drag this almost back on topic... ?
How does this look:
Warhawk Type: Armoured Vehicle Speed: 35cm Armour: 5+ CC: 6+ FF: 5+
? : 60cm : AT4+ : Lance Twin Shuriken Cannon : 30cm : AP5+ : Pulse
Skimmer
I am interested in two things here:
1) Does this have any obvious problems? Does it break basic Eldar commandments or tread on the toes of any existing vehicles? Does it fit with the general ideas, character and background? (Bear in mind that this is designed as a substitute for the Falcon Troupe in my force. It doesnt need to fill exactly the same role, but it is not a problem if the two vehicles have an overlap in purpose.)
2) What kind of points values are we looking at? I would be interested in a Troupe of 5 (or maybe 4), and would like opinions on the points cost for this.
Thanks.
_________________ https://www.cybershadow.ninja - A brief look into my twisted world, including wargames and beyond. https://www.net-armageddon.org - The official NetEA (Epic Armageddon) site and resource.
|
|
Top |
|
 |