Tau changes |
|
clausewitz
|
Post subject: Tau changes  Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 9:00 pm |
|
| Brood Brother |
 |
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 916
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
|
|
Tactica, I thought the Piranhas were ok, but I do accept Neal's point that they are probably better in their own formation. 150 or 175 I dont mind really, its not a huge difference, 175 would make them equal with the Tetras and Pathfinders. Would that settle your doubts Neal?
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
nealhunt
|
Post subject: Tau changes Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 9:24 pm |
|
| Purestrain |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 10:52 pm
Posts: 9617
Location: Nashville, TN, USA
|
|
To be honest, I'm afraid to put forth an opinion about a hard point value. I've been arguing from a conceptual basis. I don't really have a problem with starting to test it either way (150 or 175).
I suspect if it turns out to be an issue after playtest, it will likely be more than 25 points. If it's not, then it's not.
_________________
Neal
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Tactica
|
Post subject: Tau changes Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 10:37 pm |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:12 am
Posts: 2241
|
|
Cw & NH,
OK gents, so lets do this... lets give the formation some serious playtest and see how it pans out. We will take it under advisement that the new formation may prove 'better' as a stand alone formation rather than an ablative upgrade for larger armored formations.
If necessary, we will revisit the points issue post playtesting.
Agreeable?
_________________
Rob
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
clausewitz
|
Post subject: Tau changes Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2005 10:56 pm |
|
| Brood Brother |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:02 pm
Posts: 916
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
|
Playtesting is the way to go, no doubt 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
